Let me type real slowly for you. I’m not sure I can lower myself to your intellectual level, but I’ll try.
Yes, you quoted the conversation, but nothing I said indicates I am any kind of GOP e cheerleader - or any kind of RINO - that was what EV said. I mean you’re just pathetic. I am not a liar, you are.
And obviously, in addition to be a liar, you are not able to have the very valid conservations and debates about when and where we should allow the Democrats to win to make a point. I like that conversation, but when pharisee assholes like yourself accuse everyone who doesn’t want all RINOs to lose to Democrats, you prove that you are just an infantile emotional jackass.
And you are.
No; I've never said that we should just allow the Democrat to win
— but rather that your vote should always be for someone, not because the other guy's worse
. In fact, as EternalVigilance said, the continual compromise of principle in who you vote for [party-wise] only leads to a party without principle.
That is the accusation — that the Republican party is, as-a-party, without principle which the GOPe cheerleaders here are defending; and it is that defense which your allow a democrat to win
argument rests upon.
You accuse me of wanting all RINOs to lose to Democrats
— but what I said is that nobody should vote because the other guy's worse
, that to attack people unwilling to sacrifice all their principles to vote for people they do not agree with [and indeed many believe will work against their beliefs and desires] is reprehensible, and lastly that to adhere to the Republican party when they have shown no intent to act on their professed beliefs is akin to religious buffoonery.
I do not call Christianity buffoonery, but used the common culture to illustrate the blind faith
in the Republican party that is implicit in the demands being made. (Note that God doesn't require blind faith and says that faith is the evidence of things unseen. [See Heb]) —— If anything, the Republican party is like the wicked servant in the parable of the Talents — we gave them the House and they have done nothing to pursue our goals, therefore they should be cast out. (And before that we gave them the Presidency, during which they did nothing to seal the borders and nothing to reign in the debt and implemented things which we now see being used to destroy liberty and/or advance corruption. [TSA, Patriot Act, NDAA and it's successors, the bailouts].)
It is these in actions, and actions against what conservatives desire, that you defend every time you make such accusations.