Replies

The article’s author was probably biologically ready to have children 15 years before she married. She says she didn’t postpone things for a career. She simply hadn’t met her husband. I don’t know what she did for 15 years, but most women who stay single until nearly 30 probably go through a series of (failed) relationships. She’s concerned about the spiritual aspects of preserving eggs, but she’s unconcerned about the prevailing fornication and adultery of millions who postpone marriage until they’re established, meet the right, or whatever? It seems to me she’s missing the forest for the trees.

The author is far less relevant than the proposal being made by Apple and Facebook to their female staff. To harvest eggs, women are subjected to large amounts of hormones and invasive extraction procedures that can threaten their life, health and future fertility.

How egg harvesting works.

The average woman only produces one egg a month. In order to maximize the efficiency of collecting eggs, female donors go through a process called hyper-ovarian stimulation.
Hyper-ovarian stimulation is a painful procedure in which a woman is required to take large doses of hormones over a month.
The hormones over-stimulate her ovaries into producing approximately 10-12 eggs.
The eggs are extracted by a long needle.
The gathered eggs are then used for IVF or frozen for future use.

The dangerous effects of egg harvesting on women’s health and future fertility.

Hyper-ovarian stimulation can result in many negative side effects, most especially a condition known as Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS). OHSS can result in ovarian cysts, massive fluid build-up and abdominal pain, infertility and in some cases even death.
Studies in Italy and the U.K. suggest that at least 1 in 10 women suffer from some form of OHSS.
The typical drug used to stimulate egg development, Lupron, is only approved by the FDA for use in prostrate cancer, NOT egg extraction!
Females are born with a limited number of eggs. Young people often don’t think about the long term affects of their actions, particularly if they are being offered large sums of money, as young women are in egg donation or, in this case, an opportunity to postpone motherhood.

The side effects from those large doses of hormones impact other parts of the female body. A friend of mine underwent hyper-ovarian stimulation in order to improve her chances of pregnancy. Two years later, she died from breast cancer.

It seems to me she’s missing the forest for the trees.

There is a practical aspect to this, and there is a moral aspect, and they're related. The age at which one marries is not, of itself, a moral issue, if one practices continence before marriage. As you observe, many people do not, and this affects women's chances of having children much more than simple age does.

There is a high incidence of women's having babies in their 40s among orthodox Catholics (and Orthodox), Latter-Day Saints, and some fundamentalist Protestants. It appears that age (short of menopause) is not that relevant to women's fertility if they have not used contraceptives, had abortions, or contracted STDs.

Therefore, a single woman living a chaste life can reasonably expect to have children if she marries in her 30s, even her 40s, just as if she had married in her 20s (though not as many before she reaches menopause). There are no scientifically valid studies to suggest otherwise, because the testable population does not exist.