Posted on 10/19/2014 5:08:00 AM PDT by Kaslin
Uber.Com. AirBnB.Com. TaskRabbit.Com. What are these websites about, and why are they so controversial?
Let's be clear: these websites, and others like them, are online hubs for what is best described as the emerging "freelance services industries." The service providers you find through these websites are most certainly freelancers, not established corporate business owners or employees of other peoples' companies.
Uber.Com, a San Francisco-based venture that matches people who need a ride from one end of a city to another with people who have cars and are willing to travel, is perhaps the most high profile of these entities.Visit the company's website, download the app, and search for people who are ready right now to shuttle you about. If you want to be a freelance service provider, Uber.Com has a screening process whereby you can register to deliver transportation services.
This very basic " seller-hooks-up-with-buyer" type of transaction is happening at an increasing rate in cities all across the country, all on a freelance non-professional basis and mostly all via online connections. Need someone in your area to run errands or perform household chores? TaskRabbit.Com might help you find a provider who's ready right now. Got an extra room to rent for people visiting your town? AirBnB.Com connects travelers with in-home accommodations. If Uber.Com doesn't have the ride you want, their main competitor Lyft.Com might be helpful.
Be careful to not form an opinion about the freelance services industry too quickly. And don't decide that it is irrelevant and choose to ignore it. Consider these important facts:
1) Freelance service providers are business owners unto themselves, and not employees: The most egregious examples of people misunderstanding this generally happen in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and other large cities where President Barack Obama's economic entitlement policies are still popular. Indeed, protesters have demonstrated against Uber.Com in their home turf of San Francisco demanding that Uber drivers be given membership in a labor union.
But drivers for Uber.Com are independent contractors, not employees, and as such they are NOT "laborers" in the organized labor sense. If you don't like the going rates for Uber rides, then start your own freelance business without Uber.Com's assistance or get out of the industry altogether. But understand that when you're a business owner you can't just simply "protest" or "demonstrate" like the AFL-CIO suggests. Business owners have to be more responsible and mature than that.
2) The freelance services industry is a huge disruption to bigger, more powerful interests: Guess who doesn't like Uber.Com ride sharing services? The established taxi cab industry. And can you imagine who might not like AirBnB.Com providers renting a room in their home? The established hotel and motel industry. And mayors, governors, and elected officials nationwide are disposed to not liking any of this freelance enterprise because they don't know how to tax it and regulate it.
To be fair, many taxi service operators have a legitimate gripe with Uber.Com and Lyft.Com. In most cities across the U.S. (some far worse than others), owning and operating a taxi business requires thousands of dollars in training, licensing, permitting, bonding, insuring, and permitting, just to get government approval to launch the business. And then there are the recurring expenses of permit renewals and vehicle inspections - once again, all paid to the government - just to keep the business going.
This same type of expensive government taxation and regulation applies to just about every other type of service industry one can Envision. And if private individuals are undercutting, say, a hotel owners' revenues by renting out rooms in their houses and apartments, even after the hotel owner has paid all his or her government fees, then yes, the hotel owner should be upset.
Politicians share in the outrage over successful freelancers. Less business at the hotel or the taxi company means, in most cases, less tax revenue for the politicians to spend. If you're intending to become a freelance business operator, beware: there are lots of people who have an interest in your failure.
3) A successful freelance economy requires a society that respects individual rights: There may be few Americans who are willing to deny that they support "individual rights." But when confronted with what "individual rights" entails, many of us begin to hedge.
The rights of individuals to freely sell their services on the open market means competition for established industries -and these established industries often have powerful lobbying capacities than can pressure politicians to pass laws that squelch the freelancers. Do we really respect everybody's individual rights in the U.S., even if the exercise of one's rights means that my immediate financial wellbeing is challenged?
4) Resolving the disparities between established industries and freelance services providers will require less government regulation, not more: In New York City - another region where President Obama's vision of politicians determining economic winners and losers remains quite popular - Mayor Bill DeBlasio has determined that individuals who rent-out a room in their house or apartment are violating city law, and has vowed to run AirBnB.Com out of the city.
On the other hand, in Spokane, Washington - a city where American free enterprise is still generally accepted - the city just crafted new transportation industry regulations that both the taxi cab industry and Uber.Com seem to like. Despite city council members' threats to run Uber.Com out of their city, the voices of freelancers managed to be heard and the result was a compromise that subjects Uber.Com and its service providers to some new, minimal levels of government regulations, while reducing the heavy-handed burdens the city has historically placed upon traditional taxi operators.
Will the USA move to respect and uphold the rights of freelance service providers? Or will we continue to embrace the Obama-styled protections and privileges for large corporations and old-school traditional groups? Americans have an important choice to make - and the economic wellbeing of individuals is weighing in the balance.
That Denver story is not true. You know before you get in the car how much it is.
Uber does a background check on every driver.
A good, decent background check on someone to determine his/her arrest/conviction record isn't very expensive or difficult to get. You can do it on-line in about five minutes.
sitetest
Same here. The Cab company here has things locked up solid. Whenever I need a cab I call a company that only uses Vets. Clean cabs and friendly English speaking cabbies.
If people want the blessings of liberty they ought to grow up and account for the consequences of what they do.
Of course they have. It's called INTERNET REGULATION.
Any provider like these will be required to report every transaction by the "Feelance" operators and these operators will be compelled to register with some govt agency.
At the end of the year, 1099 forms will be issued by, and to, all.
My brother and his wife used AirBnB from June to September as they traveled from Norway to Spain and back up north to Iceland and then back home to Minnesota. They posted from every place to family on FB and showed where they stayed and it all looked very nice. Several in the extended family traveled to meet them in England for the Monty Python reunion.
Another nice feature is that you get to rate the driver. In turn, the driver gets to rate you as a customer.
We live in an older mobile home .. bought outright
We live on 2.25 acres .. bought outright
The kids are gone
Got a 99 Subaru and a 2000 F150 ... bought outright and pray nothing happens
(Just replaced flex plate and starter on the 150 ... 750.00 inc labor ... a steal ... set me back a month)
EVERYthing's doable depending on how you live ... your physical plant, so to speak.
The biggest thing is get rid of the mortgage
I'd live in a tent in the desert if it was the only way to not borrow money from a bank/institution.
“The biggest thing is get rid of the mortgage”
Agreed, but the other two big thorns are:
1) Prop taxes $3200/yr
2) H/O insurance $2500/yr
You never own your own home.
One check doable
Then admire you greatly. You didn’t even try to defend SS n the least little bit. So if we ever have a chance to rollback socialism, even if it includes ridding ourselves of SS, you will be ready and willing.
I just used Uber for thr first time and loved it.
The main purpose of the licensing is to protect the monopoly position of the existing operators. The safety issue is a red herring.
Historically, not entirely, although it certainly has been used as such, a mutual relationship parasitic on the taxpayer. The reality is that insurance companies have little interest in actually managing risk, in part because lawyers have so inflated both the cost of proceedings and damage awards far beyond the attendant risk but also because insurers, itself a heavily regulated business for the benefit of the big players, only want to play with money and don't give a rip about the messy details as long as they can keep raising the rate base.
In other words, it's a structural problem with lots of fingers in the pie.
We can do it without it, but we won't like it.
That hasn't been my experience with our insurance carrier, USAA (homeowner’s policy, auto policy, and rental insurance policy for princess riverdawg). I have to answer questions every year at policy renewal time regarding conditions in and around my house, driving habits and records of the insured persons on the policy, etc. We recently had our house re-roofed and got a $100 reduction on our premium. After determining that princess did not have a car at college and rarely drives during the school year, USAA reduced the family auto insurance premium. The company also told us that if we had our smoke/CO2 detectors tied into the security alarm system, we would save money there, too. I'd say that is very pro-active risk management.
These businesses are actually very well known. They’re not anywhere close to the scale of the taxi, hotel, or other service industries - and as such not everyone has heard of them - but in business & technology circles they’re becoming VERY disruptive (as in: a new generation of middle-and-up-classes are dumping the norm for these new forms, completely disinterested in the old providers). They’re like Tesla (heard of them? luxury electric cars, scaring the crap out of the auto industry): hold only a fraction of the industry’s customers, but growing _very_ fast and eating into established businesses’ base.
Uber drivers are screened well. “Thug out for a score”? not after rigorous evaluation, paying for the expensive new car (and ongoing high-end maintenance), and making a good buck just shuttling people around. If you’re going to put that much effort into getting _into_ that position, you’re NOT going to just throw it away “for a score”.
Like most “why would you carry at location X?” questions, it’s not that you need CC for the location, it’s the trip to & from. Standing on a street corner poking at the Uber app to call the car on your smartphone tells a thug you’ve got money.
bookmarking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
