[DB]

http://www.tommcclintock.com/blog/mcclintock-ballot-recommendations-0

[notaliberal]

Try this one too:
Robyn Nordell’s Conservative California Election Website

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Here is my conservative input on CA propositions:

Every one of these things is some connected group trying to enact some sort of law that will benefit them, and them only. Period.

CA is done. There is a liberal demographic avalanche in progress in this state that will take at least 2 generations to reverse, if it can be done at all.

There are 3 possible functions of CA propositions:

1: to make business in general more difficult by tightening pollution standards, imposing new fees, (like the 1 & 2 cent per oz soft drink fees for RIchmond and for SF) or by redistributing profits or by demanding yet more environmental reports or imposing environment restrictions (Chevron, Richmond) on any sort of development; Incidentally, all of these enviro suits can seek recovery legal costs as part of any settlement and are typically so awarded. All Sierra Club lawsuits get their legal costs paid, they are freebies.

2: to enrich some group, whether insurance companies, telecom companies, cable cos, trial lawyers, at the expense of the consumer/customer.

3: Or to recharge union pensions, either by changing bargaining regulations or by taking on massive cost-overrun exercises like the bullet train and the SF Bay Bridge replacement.

Subset of all of these: To create yet further bureaucracies so that Jerry Brown or his successor will be able to appoint 6-figure/yr agency heads and staff and capture more and more tax revenue for no purpose other than to gather money because they can. Like CARB.

There is zero notion of returning CA to the state it was in 30 years ago, when CA had the best schools & roads in the country. Under the name of diversity and inclusion, CA is headed towards an amalgam of Tijuana, Cartagena, and Baghdad. Exactly the same as Washington, DC, the idea is to strip the last morsel of meat off the corpse before it all collapses. If you have read any of the “prospectuses” for prior CA propositions, you know they are written in very deceptive language and it is often very hard to figure out whether you are voting yes or no. And in any event, CA courts often overturn these things.

I don’t vote “yes” for *any* of these things. If anything, CA needs a moratorium on enacting new laws or opening new bond issues for at least 3 years.

[hole_n_one]

Where can we read about California propositions with conservative input?

Yeah, I'm sure that a source of clear, concise conservative arguments will sway an ignorant California electorate.

California is lost.

Accept it.

[WonkyTonky]

Here is a site about the Judges on the ballot, its a guide arranged by county alerting voters to “judicial activists”
http://www.judgevoterguide.com/

Here’s another conservative site with their recommendations, they say vote no on all the propositions and they explain why at the link

http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/november-california-ballot-measure-recommendations-by-gary-aminoff/

[blueplum]

http://norcalteaparty.com/decsions-2014/

[vette6387]

Here are the recommendations of the San Ramon Valley Republcan Women.
They have been doing this for years and years. My wife is a past president, so I can personally vouch for their integrity.

http://www.srvrwf.org

Go to CALENDAR and follow the instructions to download a word document.

[4Liberty]

Craighuey.com
Craig Huey’s website.

[SierraWasp]

Just vote NO on all of ‘em cause they aren’t worth a spit!!!

[Argus]

I just vote no on all new bond issues, since my property taxes get raised to pay them off.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

My rule of thumb for voting in California is a straight “No” across the board. It is rare that simple rule fails. All Props are driven by radical leftists almost without exception.

Study them and see how many you will vote “Yes” on. Let us know.

[Drago]

Don’t agree with all their logic (like on Prop. 1 & Prop. 48) but here are some more from the FResno County Lincoln Club: http://www.fresnolincolnclub.org/?pg=guide

[US_MilitaryRules]

Good post. I was wondering how to find out about the judges.

Thanks to all who provided links.

[freds6girlies]

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association has a site.
They are the people behind Prop 13. and have been leading the fight against the fire tax.

http://cainitiatives2014.org

[Will we know the moment]

Look, the legislature in California is dimocrap liberal. Vote no on anything they propose.

[publius911]

Schools failing to teach gay, lesbian history

Excellent question!

I usually visit the successors to "Jarvis-Gann" and various Taxpayer Unions.

By far my biggest continuing headache is the total absence of spending proponents' failure to evaluate the impact and duration of any additional bond obligations, and the cumulative burden existing before adding to it.

California legislators, specially, do not behave like drunken sailors; more like drunken children!

Future? What future?