Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wisconsinlady

The problem we had in Wisconsin is that the 7th circuit allowed Voter ID back on Sept 12th by lifting the injunction against it and then later affirming it via a decision on Oct. 6th.

Certain municipalities in Wisconsin had already sent out some absentee ballots before Sept 12th that didn’t tell the voter that ID was required.

Elena Kagen then heard the ACLU appeal and conned Roberts and Kennedy into thinking the entire election could be challenged since Voter ID could not be uniformly applied this election because some voters got those ballots without needing to show ID.

So the law was suspended. It likely is upheld AFTER the election, which sucks for us, because that gives the Dems an extra percentage point that Scott Walker will need to overcome.


3 posted on 10/20/2014 9:21:51 PM PDT by SteveAustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SteveAustin

“The problem we had in Wisconsin is that the 7th circuit allowed Voter ID back on Sept 12th by lifting the injunction against it and then later affirming it via a decision on Oct. 6th.”

To put it another way, the federal judge was a TOTAL IDIOT in South Texas when she waited until less than 4 weeks before the election to stop Voter ID (same issue, some ballots were out, and required IDs). Had she acted a month or two earlier, she may have been able to pull off her stunt.

I doubt the Dems will trust her again with something as important as protecting election fraud.


9 posted on 10/21/2014 4:02:09 AM PDT by BobL (Don't forget - Today's Russians learn math WITHOUT calculators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson