To: Jack Hydrazine; DannyTN
On its face, the argument that she could "blow herself up" seems specious, unless the bomb was wrapped around her head, and she needed a veil to hide it.
The "fat guy" in row 8 could really be a "skinny guy" with a belt bomb around his waist, even if he does not have a veil. Add to that the fact that someone willing to blow themselves up is probably not too concerned about being identified after the fact.
Large sunglasses, broad brimmed hats, generous, flowing scarves, ski masks, goggles, gaudy make-up and sweat shirt "hoodies" can all interfere with "Facial Identification Systems". Shall we ban those too?
How about all citizens are required to face forward, remove all head gear and salute to any visibly placed surveillance camera?
16 posted on
10/22/2014 8:04:21 AM PDT by
Rebel_Ace
(My wife told me to update my tag, so I did.)
To: Rebel_Ace
You obviously don’t know anything about Islam.
19 posted on
10/22/2014 8:22:05 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Rebel_Ace
32 posted on
10/22/2014 8:55:58 AM PDT by
DannyTN
To: Rebel_Ace; Jack Hydrazine; DannyTN
As the clash of civilizations between the Free West and Sharia Islam heats up once again we find that some libertarians are more interested in fighting the heirs of Charles Martel than they are the heirs of Mohammed.
The old story of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.
36 posted on
10/22/2014 9:06:10 AM PDT by
Pelham
("This is how they do it in Mexico"- California State Motto)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson