Where have we heard that before?
You cannot separate social issues from fiscal issues.
You abandon social issues and the Leviathan only grows to fill the void.
How do you drop a line that you are being attacked on?
isn’t he the guy that hired Dan Rather and Mary Mapes? I supposed he want su also to support comprehensive border destruction and amnesty “reform”.
If I recall he also said he was going to vote for Obama in the last election. So he thought that Obama would be better for the economy than Romney?
Mark Cuban. Wasn’t he one of the Founding Fathers?
What good a prosperous nation if it be morally bankrupt?
Sounds like several Freepers lately.
States had their own laws on abortion, homosexual marriage, etc. until the federal courts got involved and struck them down. Now that the libs won through the courts, as they can't win through the ballot box, they want Republicans to stop making social issues an issue.
See how the game is played?
"Ye cannot serve God and mammon." - Matthew 6:24
Even if social issues were dropped the Republican Party is getting more liberal on economic issues and loving big government almost as much as democrats. That’s why they hate the TEA Party and grassroots conservatives because while conservatives want to give states back their rights, they in DC want control just like liberals and don’t want it taken away. So in the end giving up on social issues won’t ‘help’ anything
Stay off the social issues because the black community does NOT stand with Obama on gay military, same sex marriage, and homofascism. Why give them a major opposition political party to vote for?
Surrender! Surrender!
Should GOPe also relocate crafting production of this message overseas to China too, Markie? That’s all one ever remembers from your pie hole on that ridiculous Disney show called “Shark Tank.”
I watched that show. I don’t agree with the premise these RINOs and liberals foist on us. We are not “getting into the bedroom” nor do we push any social agenda. We are on DEFENSE in response to leftist activism to change public policy. We are simply responding by saying hell no to their stupid changes. Then we are called social activists. It is bullshit.
They were suggesting a new party that is conservative on spending and agnostic on social (sounds like RNC-E). I would say there should be a new splinter party from the dems that is in favor of liberal spending and agnostic on social issues.
Often while watching Shark Tank I look at Cuban and there seems to be something evil about his facial appearance. I’m glad he explained it for me.
‘Stay completely out of social issues’
GFY
I agree with him.
Abortion is best counteracted with info and ultrasounds. Pro life office holders have accomplished little.
Gay marriage is toothpaste out of the tube.
Let’s save our country. Make it all about freedom*, small government, and economics and we will get back to our Free Republic.
*While we will win with an overall Freedom to all law abiders platform, freedom does mean freedom to exist, even if unborn. Freedom also means families can look different including with two daddies etc. Not all lifestyles will ever be approved of by all.
What a moron. God’s already pouring out His wrath on us, BECAUSE we’re calling Him a liar on social issues. So we need to keep poking Him with a sharp stick? And we listen to insane people like this???
No thanks, Mark.
I have no desire to live in Sodom and Gomorrah that just happens to have a free market economic system.