Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TalBlack

The biggest threat to six cylinder engines is the turbo-4 and turbo-3. A lot of these turbo 4 cars nowadays are not all that efficient in real world driving, but a turbo-4 is very good at gaming the EPA tests, which decide the numbers that go on the sticker.

Most of these engines are running enough boost, that if a hose clamp slipped off, your hood would probably sheer the hood latch off :)

Boost has to have equal amounts of fuel. Some of these 4’s are breathing better than big block V8 engines when they are at full boost.

Add to that, that a 4 banger is very inexpensive to manufacture in mass quantities, and I think the 6 cylinder’s days are numbered as well.

I welcome our electric overlords, once they have the battery tech sorted out (or Mr. Fusion is available). There would be no better way to tow a trailer than a electric pickup with so much grunt at the very start of the pedal range, and delivered so smoothly. I envy the CSX locomotives that pass my backyard daily :)


94 posted on 10/24/2014 2:36:10 PM PDT by Aqua225 (Realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Aqua225

And the RPM potential!


96 posted on 10/24/2014 2:38:32 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: Aqua225

“Some of these 4’s are breathing better than big block V8 engines when they are at full boost.”

A few years ago (may still be true)the most powerful crate engine you could buy was a twin turbo 4cyl that developed 1050 hp. (I can’t imagine the sound.)


103 posted on 10/24/2014 3:01:35 PM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson