Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abby4116
I don’t see this as anything new

'No refusal' is a recent development, essentially made of whole cloth by the police. Who are they to make that call?

I remember being stopped at the only sobriety checkpoint I and there was no way out of it.

Most states have a provision in the law that an alternate route must be provided. Naturally, the police will be happy to play cat and mouse by watching for and pursuing anyone exercising a few last scraps of freedom by using such an alternate.

In addition, most checkpoints did not stop and inspect every vehicle and they certainly had nothing to do with seatbelts (another thumb-screw law originally sold under the rubric of safety).

It was totally unoffensive.

Words fail.

31 posted on 10/27/2014 10:32:46 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: relictele
Seat belts were always a secondary thing - I just mentioned that we had them on. They didn't wake up the 2 teens and dog in the back seat - just checking to see if the driver had been drinking. Didn't even ask for ID. Since I don't drink it didn't really bother me. As far as I remember, they did check every driver, but, at least in my case, they took a verbal "no" and that was it.
56 posted on 10/27/2014 11:49:54 AM PDT by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson