Looks like an Earth First tactic, Ebola at 550 mph.

Knowingly enabling infectious fatal diseases to spread is part of the psychotic breakdown going on in DC. They've dragged their feet to where talk of preventing Ebola in the US is transparent pretence. Even aside from Obama, the key people aren't serious about timely containment. The CDC's director, Thomas Frieden, is an MD who let his license lapse years ago, recruited from Bloomberg's NY City where he enforced the mayor's medicalized nannyism: a ban on large soft drinks, a smoking ban, a salt ban, a transfats ban, mandatory calorie counts at restaurants and other because-we-can harassment. Another team player is Obama's Ebola Kommissar, a political fixer whose job is to prettify the ugly truth until the election and beyond, with eager support by our incurious news media.

As if Ebola weren't enough, DHS has imported illegal alien kids known to be carriers of serious infectious diseases such as enterovirus D68, escorted them directly from our southern border into the—formerly, our—schools in every state art-link-symbol-tiny-grey-arrow-only-rev01.gif. Some physicians are braving persecution as whistle blowers and speaking out, as in this amazing article:

This is what we get for electing an affirmative action president with forged credentials, schooled in Islam in his youth, tutored in his teen years by a revolutionary Marxist and convicted pedophile, an adoring student of a black supremacy cult in adulthood, whose political career was kick started by a violent extremist with Final Solution ambitions for tens of millions of us, and whose administration features suspiciously large numbers of covert jihadists, race warriors and other deranged extremists. These enterovirus D68 outbreaks aren't accidental, they're the equivalent of a broad front biological attack, coordinated and carried out by agencies in DC best equipped to predict the results of what they've done. DC is taking multiculturalism to insane, homicidal levels. If there's an explanation that better fits the facts than intentional ethnic attrition, it hasn't appeared yet.

Craig Spencer, the "dedicated humanitarian" doctor who returned to New York City from Guinea where he was treating Ebola victims, then was diagnosed with the disease himself, should have been quarantined in situ before returning. He had every right to go to an Ebola infested pest hole and do his thing, knowing the risk of infection. But he doesn't have the right to risk the life of bystanders. And here again the authorities made avoidable errors from an excess of deference and sunny suppositions.

First the New York City Department of Health said he gallantly self-quarantined, then they admitted he took cabs and the subway to go out dining and bowling a few hours before testing positive. What has he said that wasn't a lie? Looks like an Earth First tactic, Ebola at 550 mph. Hey doc, how about a little "humanitarian" concern for those of us unbedazzled by suicidal self-sacrifice, or is Doctors Without Borders a terrorist outfit in disguise? What else should we think about those who introduce Ebola where it wasn't before? Shall we believe our possible deaths are an unfortunate but acceptable side effect of an otherwise noble venture? If Doctors Without Borders believes we're grateful for the privilege of dying for their cause they've been misinformed, most of us remain unconvinced the world is in any danger of running out of West Africans in the first place.

The city says they've learned from the Dallas disaster, which is true, like Dallas they've assured us there's nothing to worry about, on no grounds whatever—a near equivalent to lying. We notice they get hysterical telling us to remain calm. Please excuse us for worrying about agony and death from a disease that liquifies our innards and can be contracted from normal looking 'dead men walking'. We also notice they choose their words carefully, as lawyers do, misleading us by using strict definitions laymen have no reason to know, the difference between "airborne" and "aerosol transmission" for instance. What we think their words mean could cost us our lives. In the same spirit of non-disclosure, the city's rescue teams have been instructed to not use the word "Ebola" or related terms in their communications. The city has instead issued innocuous sounding code phrases. And so it is they squander what little confidence remains.

Credibility can survive failure, but not a series of avoidable failures, nor unprofessional antics, condescending kiddy-talk, outright stupidity and clumsy lies. We've seen "medicine by opinion" and it doesn't work. A less extravagant medical establishment would serve us just as well, perhaps better; less unproductive weight to carry around, less justifying the unjustifiable and fewer disastrous public relations gigs trying to protect appearances.

HIV and EBOLA: How Political Correctness Will Get You Killed!
The ongoing – and expanding –Ebola situation and how it’s being handled (or, more accurately, NOT being handled) has a parallel with the HIV panic of a number of years ago.
It may ALSO be another manifestation of the schizophrenic nature of the hard leftists who unfortunately sit at the levers of power in this country and whose double-mindedness should now be clear to all but the dullest among us.
Allow me to explain.
A San Francisco (where else?) based and HIV infected “leader”of the homosexual community began a serious campaign encouraging fellow HIV carriers to attempt to bypass or defeat the donor screening process and actively donate into the national blood supply. When pressed as to his justification for jeopardizing the entire nation, he declared that if HIV spread out into the “straight” community, it would almost certainly catalyze and accelerate the search for a vaccine.
Am I the only “conspiracy buff” to see the similarities between that and what’s going on today vis-a-vis Ebola?
I hadn’t thought about this angle until I heard Rush recently ranting about some author who’d written that because Liberia was founded by former slaves who returned to Africa, it was our unfortunate institution of slavery that is directly responsible for Ebola in the western nations of Africa. (Please note that I stop FAR short of the recent utterances of Calypso Louie Farrakan who claims that Ebola was created by evil white men to kill blacks!)
But I digress. That reasoning that America is responsible for Ebola – if it can be called “reasoning” – holds that it is America’s place to come to their rescue with a “cure”. And how better to “catalyze and accelerate” that process than to INFECT as many native born Americans HERE with the disease as possible?
Now here’s where the schizophrenia comes into the picture:
There is a growing group of folks who believe that the earth cannot support the current population approaching 7.3 billion. The bulk of them are in the same leftist camp as those now directing the present halfhearted “effort” against Ebola. Many of them are one and the SAME people directing the Ebola thing! The most radical of them embrace the words of a speaker at an early green movement/save-the-earth rally in California. Odd coincidence that, aye? He declared that “Man is the ultimate DISEASE of nature.” He got a standing O for that line!
From that meeting and others still being conducted, the greenies now believe that the 7.3 billion MUST be reduced to around 1 billion or less. And which members of which nations, ethnic groups or races are “eliminated” is irrelevant – so long as THEY are excluded!
Scriptures informs us that “A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways.” The writer must have known a fair number of the leftists of his day.
Back to my question.
If, on one hand, the leftists are sincere in their effort to SAVE THE EARTH from overpopulation, why would they attempt to save the victims of Ebola and allow them to come here?
Could it be that allowing them to come here with the disease (and sending 3,000 potential military carriers THERE to bring it back with them) while portraying these actions to the noinfo masses as the compassionate thing to do is part of the same scheme attempted earlier by the HIV crowd?
I suggest that we prepare ourselves for the spread of the this 60% to 90% fatal disease among the population of this nation. (This may have been the reason for the Homeland Security “drills” about some “zombie apocalypse”.) This IS, after all, the same America that is hated by Obama and the One World leftists now in control here as the source of every evil committed in the rest of the world and for which evils it must be properly punished?
Do I really think these miscreants – living in their sanitized and safe gated “compounds” — would do that?
After witnessing 6 years of this gang’s criminal behavior, I absolutely think that!
Dick “If THEY really ARE out to get you, it’s NOT paranoia” Bachert
10/4/2014
PS: With respect to the controversy concerning ebola’s ability to be “airborne”, last time I checked the stuff that is emitted from one’s nasal passages during a sneeze is mucosa (the polite word for snot) and, inasmuch as it came from the body, I suspect it would qualify as a “bodily fluid”.
Given that, does it not follow that if another person were to catch one of those sneezes full in the face, eyes, nose, mouth or somewhere else where an opening in the skin were present, the virus could be introduced into that person’s body?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.