Posted on 10/29/2014 9:26:14 AM PDT by yoe
. They need to immediately seize one of the machines that changed votes so the software hack can be uncovered and those responsible charged with election fraud.
This is no glitch. It is a repeat of the same sort of chicanery that permeates all democrat elections going back as far as the eye can see, IMHO Obola could not have been elected even the first time without such illegal practices. The second time for sure, especially when some precincts turned in over 100 percent voter response. The chevy trunks full of spare votes are also standing by if needed. "Its not who votes but who counts the votes that matters", STALIN
In your code you set up a counter: every time an R vote is cast, add 1 to it. When the counter hits 5, change the next R vote to D and write that to the database. Then reset counter to zero.
Problem is the code is also writing to the display/screen what it’s doing, that’s the bug that enabled this fraud to be detected.
I haven’t read the details on how those cheated are finally able to cast an R vote that ‘takes’, if they go to another machine, or a precinct captain has to somehow force the machine to accept the R vote. How they’re fixing it will tell us what is broken.
Democrats don’t have fingernails. It’s a well known fact. How can you be so damn partisan!?#_*
Except for that large contingent which regularly gets their hair and nails “did”, on the taxpayers’ dime.
Bwin the state then have an investigation. Bring the programmers up to the hill to testify.
Hope you're wrong, but not surprised if you're right ...
There is no problem in Maryland unless of course you’re a Conservative . Maryland is racing to beat Chitown as the most corrupt state in the country .
They’ll have the problem found and fixed by the end of next week.
I’m bringing in my iPhone...
The only way a democrat can win...by cheating!
100% agree
I saw a photo of some old Russian lady who walked something like 19 miles to cast her first ballot after the ussr fell. People here can’t even be bothered to get out of their Jammie’s. They need weeks to vote. It’s shameless.
“Bwin the state then have an investigation. Bring the programmers up to the hill to testify.”
With majorities in both Houses?
Who programmed these machines? RATs, of course, but specifically, what company and which employees?
Even with paper documents there are the problems of "lost" or "misplaced" boxes of ballots being found after the RATs know how many they need to win. And individuals voting under multiple identities at multiple locations, and the absentee ballots of the dead, disabled or relocated being voted for them.
That’s not a fix. I can write code to show false results online just as easily as I can write code to change an R to a D.
We need to have paper ballots. If we want to mechanize this process, the paper ballots can be counted by machine, but they need to be preserved until the election is validated so that if necessary, they can be inspected by eye and recounted by hand. That won’t solve all election fraud problems, but it will remove the easy and invisible electronic fraud.
I’d like to see the code for these machines. It would be VERY SIMPLE to tell what’s going on by looking at the code.
Any half decent programmer could write code to make the fraudulent changes, and most could figure out what’s going on by reading it. This isn’t rocket science. Most high school students who can write code could do this.
And not just 0vomit, but many others who were needed to advance the statist agenda. Franken comes to mind. I think there were quite a few others.
At the risk of sounding all tinfoil-hatty, I can remember watching election returns in 2012 on a MSM station (forgot which one. I was in a bar with friends). I found the demeanor of the anchormen very odd and I thought something was off. When Romney took an early lead, they seemed very pleased and I thought, hmmm, maybe they are not really as leftwing as I thought they were. But something about it didn’t ring true. Then, when 0vomit moved ahead, they became giddy with pleasure. It was as if they knew in advance that Romney would take a few early states just to make it “look good.” Because really, if 0vomit got every state or got 100% (or 110%) in too many places, it would be a little too obvious what was going on.
Tinfoil hat off now. Back to your regularly scheduled posting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.