Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2014 12:08:57 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DeaconBenjamin

I’m certain that whatever the tax is it will be deductible on their USA tax.


2 posted on 11/01/2014 12:10:33 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin
"If Google takes intellectual property from the EU and makes use of it, the EU can protect this property and demand that Google pay for it,"

Good for the EU! I approve.

3 posted on 11/01/2014 12:16:03 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Taxes are a cost of doing business. The tax will be paid by net users. How? They will see more ad trash.

Enjoy, Euro-fools.


4 posted on 11/01/2014 12:18:33 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Life is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; John Robinson

Another threat on the horizon.


5 posted on 11/01/2014 12:18:43 PM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan; humblegunner; Eaker; TheMom; mylife

All hands on deck. This will eventually be aimed at us.


6 posted on 11/01/2014 12:19:47 PM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Google should pull their servers out of Spain. ay off all the employees who work here. Screw em.


7 posted on 11/01/2014 12:20:33 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Tax the good deeds, reward corrupt politicians, socialism for yah.


8 posted on 11/01/2014 12:20:38 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Where are the internet rule which say that news stories cannot be aggregated into web searches? Anyone?

WTF is this? Screw these people.


9 posted on 11/01/2014 12:21:39 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin
PP said that the legislation achieved its main goal: to protect creators of cultural material on the internet.

The Founding Fathers would be shocked if they could see how their concept of a very limited copyright has become virtually without limit.

11 posted on 11/01/2014 12:22:13 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Google is run by Liberals. They should be thrilled at this opportunity to pay taxes! (or should it be called an “investment?”)


12 posted on 11/01/2014 12:23:49 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

It’s about time. Google makes many billions of dollars selling ads for views of content that other people created. Then they make more selling data about everyone that looks at that content, or the accompanying ads. We used to call that “free-riding”, or worse.


14 posted on 11/01/2014 12:39:10 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Thanks to the majority held by the ruling Popular Party...

I don't think the ruling Popular Party is going to be very popular in the future.

15 posted on 11/01/2014 12:40:26 PM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

I do business on the Internet, and Content. I desperately WANT Google to find me.


17 posted on 11/01/2014 12:57:38 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Germany introduced such a scheme in 2013, a move which saw Google remove copyrighted material from media outlets represented by media industry body VG Media. However, the industry group have now backtracked by granting Google a free licence to continue to displaying that content.

I'll bet it did. The other side of the equation is that this "free" use is also "free" advertisement. You can't have the latter without putting up with the former.

It's certainly the right of the material's originator to charge and restrict use as he/she desires. That's why FR disallows postings from those who desire it, extracts from those who desire it, and why links to the original media are supplied in the posting. For a third party such as the government to intrude on this transaction by levying a tax is the sort of thing governments do that sound fine and end up with negative consequences. As it did in Germany.

Every politician elected should have this lesson tattooed on his/her/its forehead so they can see it in the mirror every morning: taxes do two things: they generate revenue and discourage the activity being taxed. You can't have the one without the other.

And so taxing this sort of thing will discourage it as well, and that might not be a good thing overall. And there is an additional question that government should find uncomfortable but does not: it will generate revenue...for whom? For the content owners, or for the government? Is 100% of this transferred to the former, or does the government take its cut off the top for "administrative" purposes? And if the latter, who really is the beneficiary? And why does government tend to grow?

19 posted on 11/01/2014 1:08:40 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Google makes their stuff accessible to the world.

All they have to do is stop including Spanish material in their searches.

Spain will either back down or fall off the (google) map.


24 posted on 11/01/2014 1:23:47 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin
a package which included the introduction of charges for the online use of fragments of information, opinion and entertainment grouped together, for example, on search engines

So that means that if a Spanish user searches for this thread I will get some of that tax passed on to me because of this post. I'll go out to the mailbox and wait for the check.

Funny, how by protecting the owners of any intellectual property the government will likely get 100% of the profits while those they protect will get nothing. Even the mafia can't get that deal when they sell protection.

28 posted on 11/01/2014 1:32:46 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeaconBenjamin

That’s about as dumb as record companies charging radio stations to play their songs.


30 posted on 11/01/2014 2:00:09 PM PDT by kik5150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson