You do not recognize the risk of not having a control group for testing a new treatment. There is a big chance that the experimental treatment does nothing and the patient recovers by their own immune response. If you do not have a control ineffective treatments get commercialized and then the damage is from the assumption that it is going to help.
How many have recovered without experimental treatment? Of those who survive almost all had no treatment other than palliative - fluids and nutrition.
You do a disservice to those who volunteer for clinical trials by calling them pigs or rodents.
Mortality rates for palliative treatment for ebola are already known and well documented.
There's your control group. You already have it. No need to imperil more people.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3223586/posts?page=37#37
See post #37.
70% mortality rate.
No time for olacebos; that % rate is horrendous.
Medic’s Oath says:
First, do no harm.