How the GOP Should Deal With Obama's Incorrigibility

Townhall.com ^ | November 7, 2014 | David Limbaugh

[Kaslin]

Clinton was impeached, that is correct. However he was not removed by the senate, because the dems had the majority. I am sure we could impeach him and maybe even remove him. I am thinking of the future though of the rat party to be the minority party for a long time, not just for a few years

[Kaslin]

Why don’t you shut up, my post wasn’t to you, was it?

[CyberAnt]

But .. think about this .. if you have a dem president, it automatically gives the other dems preference (at least they want people to think so).

So, I want a Republican who believes in GOD, and the sanctity of life.

[Kaslin]

That is true

[morphing libertarian]

and Boehner and McConnell should tell the hero of benghazi they will not fund any function s which carries out amnesty

[Lazamataz]

"Who cares what you’re tired of? And we don’t need to get over it!"

Why don’t you shut up, my post wasn’t to you, was it?

Both of you shut up! I'm sick of both of your complaining! Get over all of it!

[Kaslin]

Will do

[Lazamataz]

Ahhh, you're no fun any more.

[Let_It_Be_So]

As much as I would like to see major funding reductions (if not outright abolishment of certain agencies), the fact remains that it would take a “veto-proof” Senate majority to make such moves stick, would it not?

Short of a Convention of States type effort (which could force a re-thinking of the entire role of the federal government vis-a-vis the reinforcement of the original intent and application of the 10th amendment), perhaps a more pragmatic approach would be to pass a bill that would basically shift existing funding to the States in the form of block grants. This would allow for a deliberative process in each state as to what program(s) would continue and what programs would basically sunset and go away.

When Obama vetoes this kind of Bill, he would not be able to do so while asserting that Congress is trying to “do away” with Education (DOE), the environment (EPA), the less fortunate among us (HHS), etc. The Congress can then say, “we aren’t making that judgement, we’re just wanting these decisions to be made at the State level”.

Then,even if Congress doesn’t override Obama’s veto, the case can be made to the electorate that if you like the idea of having these decisions (and the funding that goes with it) made at the state level, give us the rest of the Senators we need to override such vetoes and/or a conservative President in 2016.

[Carry_Okie]

1. Demand his college transcripts and financial aid records.
2. Investigate his social security number.
3. Send a team to Hawaii to find that birth certificate.
4. Investigate his historic ties to known communists and expose their intents.
5. Expose the trail of weapons to named enemies of the United States, in Benghazi, in Fast and Furious, and in Syria right now.

That would be a good start.

It's not so much about being a "birther" as it is to tie him in knots.

[Iron Munro]

Like all Amish mug shots is he wearing a VOTE OBAMA shirt?

His last Che Guevara T-Shirt was stolen at the bath house.

[Ray76]

I’ve seen and heard enough Boehner to know that his is weak and confused. He does not oppose usurpation of Congressional authority, he does not oppose Obama’s agenda and in fact advances it.

I’ve you’re too blind to see and require further “waiting” then that’s your problem.

[Liz]

He is in padded room territory. He thinks the 2/3s who did not
vote support him? Has he seen his disapproval numbers lately?

Nice circumlocution, josh.

[rdb3]

Impeaching Obama at this point would help the Marxists in the long run by making him a martyr to their cause.

Indeed.

As much as 0bozo deserves impeachment, I truly think that pursuing it is a fool's errand.

Let us not make him a martyr!

Jesus Christ: You can’t impeach Him and He ain’t gonna resign.