Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lexinom
Who is arguing against advances in observational sciences?

Apparently the scientists with their preconceived notions of what qualifies to be observed and what doesn't.

They're working on the assumption that the supernatural can't be found out through the scientific method, and arbitrarily assign the label to something that they don't even know if it IS supernatural.

187 posted on 11/10/2014 5:30:50 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
I think they are right: One cannot find the supernatural directly; rather, one can dust Creation for the fingerprints of the Creator and find evidence thereof...

You raise an interesting point, though. The GToE is not required for the scientific advances that we've enjoyed anymore than beer is required to be sold at highschool football games. The GToE has held back further enlightenment for over a century. Eventually it will be discarded, esp. as new evidence (such more living fossils, esp. something big like a nocturnal pterosaur alive and well in 2014) comes to light... Some of us are working on this diligently...

196 posted on 11/10/2014 11:03:22 AM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson