A theory is already proven useless if it has too break several scientific laws in order to supported.
Also I mentioned the mathematicians b/c they have proven with math and our hard scientific knowledge of DNA and the assumed rate of ‘good’ mutations that not billions nor trillions of years would still not make evolution even close to possible nor probable. But obviously ymmv...
“A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describes some aspects of the universe. A scientific law always applies under the same conditions, and implies that there is a causal relationship involving its elements.”
On the other hand, a theory tells you “why” the observations underlying the law occur. A law fails and is falsified if one observation is contrary to what is expected. A theory can be revised to account for variations in observations. Both law an theory are falsifiable.