Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upchuck

Lack of competition is not what is hurting internet access in this country, regulatory pseudo-monopolies are the problem.

Going back to a system of so-called “natural monopolies” for broadband would make the situation a hundred times worse... unless you’re the CEO of Time-Warner.

This is simply crony capitalism at its best. Under this hair-brained idea, Obama’s furiously fellating friends over at the major media corporations would gain access to local monopolies, instead of having to compete with cable broadband providers, DSL providers, and wireless providers for lower rates and better speeds, your government would award an internet service provider monopoly to ONE provider in a given area — resulting in even higher prices, even lower quality of service, and enshrining Obama’s corporate sycophants in the media at the helm of monopolistic ISP control.


21 posted on 11/10/2014 2:04:29 PM PST by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jameslalor
your government would award an internet service provider monopoly to ONE provider in a given area

Yep, that's the end goal. Monopolies can rarely sustain without government coercion and this is one of those cases.

26 posted on 11/10/2014 2:26:19 PM PST by palmer (Minnesota Is Monitoring 48 for Ebola, Already 12 Go Missing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson