To: Westbrook
We need ONE true conservative running against 3 establishment types instead of the other way around.
17 posted on
11/12/2014 6:42:43 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: MrB
We need ONE true conservative running against 3 establishment types instead of the other way around.
Yes.
Look at some of the recent election results.
NC -- Graham had 4 or 5 contenders in the primaries. He probably hired a couple of them to siphon off votes from the others. Winner: Graham. Probably because of name recognition. Trying to introduce 3 or 4 or 5 newbies to the public is difficult with limited resources.
Louisiana -- 2 Pubbies running against Landreau. Had one of them defaulted to the other, that election most likely would have been won on election day by the other Republican. Instead, we have a run-off, multitudes of out-of-state influence, and a greater potential for massive voter fraud that favors the Dem.
Arkansas -- sitting Rep (R) decided to challenge sitting Senator (D). Rep had little primary challenge and faced the Senator in the election. The Rep, Tom Cotton, won 57% to 39%, even though most polls showed it neck-and-neck just days before the election.
Conservatives need to select ONE good/solid/strong candidate against the political machine.
31 posted on
11/12/2014 7:05:32 AM PST by
TomGuy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson