Posted on 11/18/2014 6:06:13 AM PST by wagglebee
CAUTION: The following article includes some graphic descriptions of sexuality in explaining the contents of a sex ed program intended for ten-year-olds.
Last year, Chicago’s public school district outraged local parents and made national headlines when it announced its new sex education program would include kindergarteners. Now, the program is again stirring controversy, as parents at one elementary school reacted with shock and dismay upon learning that their 5th grade students – ages 10 and 11 – would be taught how to use female condoms and lube for both vaginal and anal sex, with an emphasis on longer-lasting intercourse and enhanced sexual pleasure.
Parents at Andrew Jackson Language Academy were invited to attend a seminar on the school’s sex-ed program in a letter from school principal Mathew Ditto. The letter promised that during the seminar, school faculty and a Chicago Public Schools representative would “share the lessons and information that will be taught to your child.”
According to the letter, topics to be covered in the sex-ed program beginning in kindergarten include personal safety, human reproduction and childbirth, puberty, abstinence and healthy relationships. Starting in 4th grade, information about HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases is introduced. By 5th grade, students are taught how to obtain and use contraception, including a condom demonstration.
Only 20 parents showed up for the seminar, where they heard a presentation by a CPS official and were given the opportunity to examine the materials for each grade’s sex-ed curriculum, contained in binders.
One attendee, Local School Council chairwoman Angela Bryant, told DNAinfo.com she was “offended” and “horrified” by the lessons intended for the 5th grade, which were explicit not just in content, but in tone.
“The curriculum is appalling," Bryant said. "The language for me is very much concerning to me as a parent. The content goes beyond what I feel is age-appropriate for a fifth-grade.”
Bryant said she particularly objected to the flippant language used to describe sexual activity.
One lesson, titled "Feel Good Reasons to Use FCs [Female Condoms]," touted the prophylactic as a great way to prolong sexual intercourse, since it does not have to be removed immediately after ejaculation. "Once you pop, you don't have to stop!" the lesson says.
The same lesson includes a drawing of a woman lifting up her dress next to a smoking BBQ. “Feel the heat!” the caption reads. “FCs adjust to your body temperature, so you and your partner can both feel the heat.”
Yet another lesson extols the virtues of artificial lubricants, in a similarly flippant tone: “Got issues? Lube! Lube! Lube!”
“The language to me was the most offensive part initially,” Bryant told DNAinfo. “Pop and lube, lube lube, and those kind of things. ... [It] serves to rob many of our children of their innocence."
But the images were too much for another parent, who took photos of the graphic illustrations, which included a diagram of anal insertion of a female condom, a close-up “map” of a woman’s external genitalia drawn in a pornographic fashion, and a photo of a child on a “Slip N Slide” water toy alongside instructions on how to use lube to facilitate anal penetration.
School officials quickly moved to distance themselves from the shocking curriculum, claiming that materials shown were “mistakenly downloaded” and not intended for public consumption.
"It is not and never was part of the student sexual education curriculum," CPS spokesman Bill McCaffrey wrote. "It was mistakenly downloaded and included in the parent presentation, and we agree with parents it is not appropriate for elementary school students.”
But the same materials can still be found on the website of another CPS elementary school, Waters Elementary, which notes that it uses the recommended 5th grade curriculum for 6th graders and has “opted out” of the condom demonstration. Additionally, a teacher at a third elementary school who wished to remain anonymous told DNAinfo that the controversial 5th grade lesson plans were used in her school last year. “Parents were really upset,” the teacher said.
The curriculum’s raunchy depiction of sexuality isn’t the only issue some parents may have with the curriculum. One unit is devoted to promoting acceptance of homosexual behavior. Another teaches children that once they reach the age of 12, they no longer need parental permission to access contraceptives or STD testing, and recommends Planned Parenthood as a good resource for clandestine reproductive care. The same lesson emphatically states that the morning-after-pill is “NOT an abortion pill,” despite the fact that the pill’s secondary method of action is to prevent a newly conceived life from implanting in the uterine wall, causing an early termination.
CPS spokesman McCaffrey said that in response to the parental outcry, Dr. Stephanie Whyte, chief officer of student health and wellness at CPS, now plans to meet with staff at Andrew Jackson Language Academy to review the sex-ed curriculum grade by grade. A community meeting will be planned as well.
That’s good to hear.
This sounds like a way to make sex with children more enjoyable for those who like such things. Those who are encouraging children to have sex are usually wanting to have sex with children.
You are so right. I still don’t understand why so many people just didn’t care then and, despite the recent election, don’t really care now.
LIES. Push 3 steps, pretend to be hapless, give back 1 step. See: Bill Ayers, et.al.
My daughter has undertaken that responsibility with her children.
That is so wonderful! You must be very happy and proud of her for that decision. It is a wise one!
And, while doing this, she had kids #4 and #5, and finished her bachelor’s degree. Yup. Pretty proud dad, here.
Check to be sure. Even if you're a staff member at the school.
I have run into way too many situations where parents, and sometimes even principals, honestly had no idea what was going on in their schools. All it takes is one teacher who is more “openminded” and “progressive” than others on the faculty, combined with supervisory staff who are more trusting than they should be.
What's really scary is that a young teacher in her 20s may honestly not know that what she's teaching would even be controversial or upsetting to the majority of parents.
I agree but they are also greatly endangering them. One newspaper reporting this, has pictures. The ?teacher? (more likely a planned parenthood employee) getting into very suggestive positions/contortions to demonstrate for the children how to insert these condoms! Just when you thought you were beyond being shocked by these folks anymore!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.