Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

I understand that his silence is his right in a court of law.

But it is also my right to make a decision on my own regarding his silence.

If he doesn’t address it, he looks guilty to me.

All he has to say, with his own mouth, is that he didn’t do it.

I got relieved of jury duty once in a stolen car case, because the defense made it clear that their client was not going to take the stand.

That’s fine, and I realize that it’s his right, but if they want me to decide his culpability, I’d need to hear about the incident from him.

The judge was most furious with me, and scolded me, but I don’t care at all. I’m not going to try to decide a man’s innocence without hearing from him. That is very suspicious behavior to me.


170 posted on 11/19/2014 7:36:29 AM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: chris37

It is never wise to speak out while waiting for an investigation to finish.


173 posted on 11/19/2014 7:39:50 AM PST by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: chris37

The best way to know if something’s phony or not is to watch CNN. If they’re pushing something—guaranteed it’s phony.

CNN is pushing the “Cosby’s suspicious silence” trick. I don’t believe them.

This method never fails. Works for any liberal news source. Sometimes Fox plays the same game.


205 posted on 11/20/2014 2:40:22 AM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson