Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP factions tear into each other over strategy to block Obama's amnesty order
UK Daily Mail ^ | November 20, 2014 | Francesca Chambers

Posted on 11/20/2014 12:49:10 PM PST by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: MeshugeMikey
"Shamnesty"

Is that "a" in that word a long "a", or a short "a"???

41 posted on 11/20/2014 4:08:59 PM PST by SierraWasp (Put a plastic shopping bag over the Governor's bald head!!! I signed the petition to overturn this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
moderates . . . don't want to disrupt . . .

. . . the rapid collapse of the country. And why should they? It'll probably hang on as long as they do.

42 posted on 11/20/2014 4:24:57 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Ive forgotten what the meanings are for short a and long a’s sorry...


43 posted on 11/20/2014 4:51:49 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

J, with all due respect, “You keep doing the same thing”....too.

You divide the primary vote by voting third party when they can’t possibly win. That is the reason we get stuck, time and time again with the likes of a Jeb Bush or a Romney as the nominee. Third party people have a lot to do with nominating Rinos and Democrats. Libertarians in Va. cost us 2 elections. Two. To what end?

Had Obama been defeated, we wouldn’t be facing this Illegal immigration executive order. Obamacare would have been stopped in it’s tracks. So many actions of his would not exist had he and the Democrats been defeated. We are paying a terrible price just because he was re-elected.

We need to unite behind the most electable Conservative running in order to win in ‘16. If people like you don’t join us, then you are contributing to Democratic victories and the progressive agenda. Our nation is going to cease to exist.

We’re on life support right now. Last election was dire.
This next election will be life or death.

As Andrew Breitbart said, “first we take out the Democrats, then we go after the Rinos.”


44 posted on 11/20/2014 4:56:01 PM PST by stilloftyhenight (...staying home isn't an option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight
If people like you don’t join us, then you are contributing to Democratic victories and the progressive agenda.

Earn. Our. Votes.

With conservatives. Not with compromise. Voting for Democrat enablers simply ... enables Democrats. Who could possibly have seen that coming?

45 posted on 11/20/2014 5:02:59 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight
You divide the primary vote by voting third party when they can’t possibly win

You act like the Republicans are ENTITLED to my vote. They aren't. Get over it.

And you say 3rd party can't win. They have won as many recent presidential elections as the liberal Republicans.

None.

So you are voting for a liberal... throwing your vote away on someone that can't win, and want to lecture me?

/johnny

46 posted on 11/20/2014 5:06:45 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight
There are no RINOs. There are no squishy Republicans.

There are only LIBERAL republicans.

If you vote for a liberal republican, you are voting for a liberal, and you are a liberal.

Own your liberalism.

/johnny

47 posted on 11/20/2014 5:23:49 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight
"As Andrew Breitbart said, 'first we take out the Democrats, then we go after the Rinos.'"

we can't take out democrats without defeating the media. The internet is beginning to help, but the RINOS work for them everyday because of their fear for being attacked or taken off the D.C. cocktail circuit "A"-list.

48 posted on 11/20/2014 5:35:51 PM PST by Baynative (Did you ever notice that atheists don't dare sue Muslims?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
There are no 'moderate republicans' or RINOs.

There are only liberal republicans that can't ever be allowed to win an election (primary or general) again.

/johnny

49 posted on 11/20/2014 5:42:18 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
And you can't ever take out the Dems. Liberal idiots will always exist.

What you can do is quit voting for liberal republicans. Those you can take out.

And it weakens the Dems, too, because the liberal agenda can't get done without help from liberal republicans.

/johnny

50 posted on 11/20/2014 5:44:16 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
"There are no 'moderate republicans' or RINOs. There are only liberal republicans..."

I heard leaks about this amnesty garbage and called McCain's office about the statement that everyone would undergo stringent background checks.

I told the staffer to ask McCain to include the line that a background check MUST include cross checking voter registration to see if these people have committed felony elections fraud.

I was told that such a statement would be seen as argumentative.

"There are no 'moderate republicans' or RINOs. There are only liberal republicans"

51 posted on 11/20/2014 6:19:54 PM PST by Baynative (Did you ever notice that atheists don't dare sue Muslims?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

“I don’t think the president should shut down the government to try to break the Constitution,” Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal told a flustered Chuck Todd Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Todd had just asked Jindal, “If the president goes through with his executive action (on immigration), do you think Republicans and Capitol Hill ought to use even the power of shutting down the government to stop him from doing it?”

“Two things,” Jindal responded. “I don’t think the president should shut down the government to try to break the Constitution. The reality is this. I do think the-—

Todd interrupted: “You think that the president would be shutting down the government?”

“Oh, absolutely—” Jindal said.

“And so, you do want Republicans to fight him on this, to the point that it could shut down the government,” Todd interrupted.

“I don’t think the president should shut down the government,” Jindal repeated.

“You’re twisting my question,” Todd complained. “That means you want that kind of showdown.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3227963/posts


52 posted on 11/20/2014 6:28:00 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Everyone saw that coming


53 posted on 11/21/2014 3:29:22 AM PST by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson