Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
There are mountains of evidence in support of Cosby being a drugging rapist, a serial rapist. A lot more than on Clinton’s rape, the one that was revealed during the Paula Jones lawsuit, just as Constand’s lawsuit brought forth 13 Cosby accusers.

There's your big lie, which you keep repeating ad nauseum. Not only aren't there "mountains" of evidence, there wasn't even enough evidence when a DA went after him.

What you have is a dozen or so accusations. Worse, they are all decades old. Worse, they are from women who blacked out while drinking with Cosby. Worse, they were with him to "advance their acting careers," which anyone with half a brain knows means have sex with him.

Let me tell you what happened, genius. Surprise, surprise, they screwed him and he didn't help their careers. So they felt like sluts and hated him for it, taking no responsibility for their own actions.

Yep, he apparently cheated on his wife and had an easy time with a lot of "aspiring actresses" who then hated him, but who were replaced by others.

So what? Was he moral? Nope. Is what he did common in Hollywood? Are you kidding?

So it's not enough for a smear job. So drugs and rape are added, and these hateful women say "fine with me."

Which theory sounds more reasonable? Which is easier for a famous person to enact? Which is FAR more common?

Grow up, you're being suckered by a Rat smear campaign against the ONE famous Hollywood Black Liberal who's telling Blacks to grow up.

It's BECAUSE he's a flaming liberal that the Rats are so afraid of him. They can't dismiss him as a conservative, and he was about to come back with a big show.

So they got Alinsky-level dirty and smeared him, to silence him with the Black vote they CANNOT afford to lose.

And you've been taken by it hook, line and sinker.

85 posted on 11/22/2014 2:43:53 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

It is mountains of evidence, not hair samples and DNA, but a massive piling on of evidence as we start putting it together, what you deny as you rant and rave for reasons unknown.

How much evidence did we rely on for Clinton’s 1978 rape that surfaced in 1997 for Jones’s lawsuit?

The DA’s proclaiming that his investigation of the reported rape at the time convinced him of Clinton’s guilt?

The 13 women willing to testify to his rape techniques?

The Settlement before trial that Clinton made with Juanita Broaddrick about a year and half after the rape?

All these other women and near misses that are still emerging, and still reinforcing the claims that he used drugs on and raped women?

You must have been going insane to watch us become convinced of Bill Clinton’s guilt based on a single woman 19 years later.


86 posted on 11/22/2014 2:52:19 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson