Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CityCenter

“I agree with no indictment. I don’t think they would have taken this long to announce it if there was one.”

Oh you mean that the side that thinks the officer should not be indicted is not a threat. That such side is not going to go on a rampage and start killing and burning if it is announced that Holder and the mob have managed to antagonize the jury into indicting. Therefore there would be no reason to wait unless there is no indictment.


511 posted on 11/24/2014 3:45:06 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]


To: Revel

Holderjust has to leave a list with Louis learners replacement for results.


523 posted on 11/24/2014 3:48:09 PM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

To: Revel

No indictment means 100% chance of riots.
Indictment means 100% chance of riots.
It doesn’t matter what the jury has decided.


559 posted on 11/24/2014 4:02:11 PM PST by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson