Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Second Amendment First
Bull CRAP. People protecting property is NOT against the law.
To: Second Amendment First
The difference between the Rodney King riots (Korean shopkeepers w/guns) and Ferguson Riots (Oathkeepers guarding merchants w/guns) is the occupant of the executive mansion. PERIOD.
3 posted on
11/29/2014 3:32:36 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
To: Second Amendment First
Can't have people making their own security arrangements. The police are going to find they have no friends on either side if they keep this up.
4 posted on
11/29/2014 3:33:41 PM PST by
Truth29
To: Second Amendment First
Individual property owners can request “security assistance” on their own property.
The idea of the cops “negotiating” with the protesters and then failing to do their damn jobs is disgusting!
6 posted on
11/29/2014 3:34:30 PM PST by
G Larry
(Amnesty imposes SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL immigrants & minorities)
To: Second Amendment First
I guess the rights of criminals and looters come first in Obama’s Amerika
7 posted on
11/29/2014 3:35:28 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Second Amendment First
9 posted on
11/29/2014 3:36:05 PM PST by
Brother Cracker
(You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
To: Second Amendment First
operating without a license...
They just make up "laws" as they go along.
10 posted on
11/29/2014 3:36:16 PM PST by
SpaceBar
To: Second Amendment First
Companies hire private security all the time and they’re armed. This is no different. The objection is ideological, not legal.
To: Second Amendment First
Threatens to arrest people defending others from rioters. Does nothing about rioters.
I’m guessing Jay is doing what he can to win friends in DC because he realizes MO is done with him.
12 posted on
11/29/2014 3:41:32 PM PST by
Bogey78O
(We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
To: Second Amendment First
If you want to know what is wrong with St. Louis, read that headline again.
“mysterious”.
What is mysterious to reasonable people about wanting to protect your property?
What is “mysterious” about the Oath Keepers?
What kind of reporter would write such a headline and what kind of editor would let it go to print?
That is not mysterious.
To: Second Amendment First
How dare people protect private property from looters. The Just-us department has assured HDTVs and Nikes for free.
To: Second Amendment First
Yeah, stupid whitey! Trying to protect your property from minorities is ILLEGAL!
To: Blue Jays
Serious question.
How does one hop in their vehicle in Nebraska, with a rifle, gain access to a rooftop (at a workplace owned by someone they don't know 500 miles away) and be able to lawfully defend said business?
It must require a very detailed knowledge of the law.
19 posted on
11/29/2014 3:45:59 PM PST by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: Second Amendment First
Threatened with arrest for operating without a licenseOperating without a license.
Why, by gum, that could be ANYTHING.
"Sir, you need to move along. You are 'operating without a license'."
20 posted on
11/29/2014 3:51:21 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Deciding Female Criminal Guilt By How Hot They Are Since 1999 !)
To: Second Amendment First
Burning the bitch down: the new civil right.
21 posted on
11/29/2014 3:52:16 PM PST by
denydenydeny
("World History is not full of good governments, or of good voters either "--P.J. O'Rourke)
To: Second Amendment First
“Gentlemen, get the thing straight once and for all—the policeman isn’t there to create disorder, the policeman is there to preserve disorder.”
Mayor Richard Daley, Chicago
To: Second Amendment First
If you are relying on the government to protect you or your business, you are foolish.
23 posted on
11/29/2014 3:53:30 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
To: Second Amendment First
To whom do the rooftops belong?
24 posted on
11/29/2014 3:53:56 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Second Amendment First
Same as New Orleans:
The cops responded and CONFISCATED GUNS, sometimes slamming totally law-abiding grandmothers, slamming them violently to the ground.
In a desperate situation the authorities will crack down on the EASIEST targets —the law abiding citizens.
Doing that underscores the image of others that they’re in control. It also helps them FEEL they’re somehow still “in control”.
26 posted on
11/29/2014 3:57:21 PM PST by
gaijin
To: Second Amendment First
The "Oath Keepers" prove their talk is all they have; for a group that supposedly "defends the constitution" they sure caved quickly.
Just more posturing by more slaves too scared to have the courage of their convictions.
27 posted on
11/29/2014 3:59:22 PM PST by
ex91B10
(We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!a)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
