Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

The only downside is that Obama may get the credit for the economic benefits, even though he opposed everything that enabled this.


16 posted on 12/03/2014 4:03:46 PM PST by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TwelveOfTwenty

Yep. As the author stated, he is short on vision but long on nerve.

Infuriating, isn’t it?

What is equally infuriating is that radicals like Obunghole know exactly what they are doing. They know the attention span of much of the electorate doesn’t know or doesn’t care that they oppose all energy that is not solar or wind, so they can (and do, with not even a smidgen of suppressed guilt and a surplus of smugness, alone with a touch of infuriating glee) take full responsibility for the result.

That is why, when having a discussion with a fever-faced, spittle-lipped liberal, you hear them say things like: “Obama is responsible for more expansion of the energy sector than any president since...”

And they believe it in their hearts of hearts...


21 posted on 12/04/2014 4:49:06 AM PST by rlmorel (The Media's Principles: Conflict must exist. Doesn't exist? Create it. Exists? Exacerbate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Sort of like King Herod the 3rd talking credit and the glory of God to himself.


23 posted on 12/04/2014 7:26:29 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The Keystone Pipeline Project : build it already Congress !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson