Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: firebrand

—>>>Patrick Lynch stands by his claim that this was not a choke hold. But I don’t think the technical definition matters all that much. I guess it does if what the cop did was legal rather than illegal. You will see why this is more complicated when the evidence is released.

All this is very true. And, if shown there is a difference in these holds, by now, millions think they deliberately choked the guy / to cause the death / can’t put the Jeanie back in now.. It was an accident / not about race / or hate crime as the left is saying. This cop’s life is done like Darrin Wilson. I feel bad there is a death but why don’t people just stop and not fight the police. Now, the media has another narrative / blacks being killed by white police. The man was warned repeatedly not to be there. Right from the beginning, he told the police that he wasn’t going anywhere.


50 posted on 12/03/2014 8:43:09 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Christie at the beach

A chokehold is just that: a hold. The cop put his arm around Garner’s neck and pulled him back, which is not a “hold.”

Maybe they should have clubbed him instead?


57 posted on 12/03/2014 9:26:03 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Christie at the beach

Lynch had an op-ed in the New York Post weeks and weeks ago, telling all about the choke hold and how this wasn’t, so everybody knew. Many don’t care about the facts. I’m not an expert on these holds but some freepers seemed to be, on the original thread. It wasn’t a case of the facts not coming out soon enough. But it didn’t matter I guess.


66 posted on 12/04/2014 12:55:42 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson