Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gunner TLW

Not true. Sidearms are used, it is just not the preferred tool for anything other than unique circumstances.


27 posted on 12/05/2014 8:32:58 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Manly Warrior

Guys, I promise that I’m trying to rain on anybodies parade nor am I venturing into a discussion that I don’t know something about. I retired as the Division Gunner, 2D Marine Division in 2008, after 34 years of Active Service. I then spent the next four years as the Training Advisor for the CG Regional Command South West Afghanistan, training the Afghan Security Forces. As the Division Gunner, Infantry Weapons Officers, I would rountily have units and Commanding Officers float the idea replacing the M9. It always came back to the same thing, no matter how many studies we did. No one could show where the M9 had ever failed in Combat. Why, because nobody was foolish enough to carry only a pistol in the fight. Yes, I love the M1911A1! But, I do not advocate spending money on a system that meets the current needs. There are only a very few Sepecial Operations units that use a “Back-Up” gun for very technical use. They already have their new gun.


30 posted on 12/05/2014 8:43:24 AM PST by Gunner TLW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson