[Pollster1]

This is not quite the narrative we heard from the media when the accused was their darling, Bill Clinton. I wish they had the integrity to maintain a single position regardless of whether the accused marches in lockstep with the liberal narrative or questions liberal positions.

In Clinton's case, there was genuine physical evidence of a recent abuse of power and that he had lied under oath, but the media backed their hero. In Cosby's case, there is no evidence at all that I know of, and the charges are (as far as I have noticed) decades old. Yet they are going after Cosby and protecting Clinton. Media hypocrisy disgusts me.

[ansel12]

When it comes to rape, the 1997 Paula Jones lawsuit brought forward Juanita Broaddrick, who told us of being raped in 1978 by Bill Clinton, and most of us believe her.

In 2005, Andrea Constand, director of operations for Temple University’s women’s basketball team (Cosby’s college, and one he still sat on the board of) filed a lawsuit against cosby after claiming that he had drugged and raped her in 2004, 13 women came forward to describe their own sexual assaults from him, mostly druggings and rape. Cosby settled out of court in 2006.

The DA said that he felt that Cosby was guilty, but that by the time she went to police a year after the rape, there wasn’t enough evidence to go to court with in a criminal trial.