[GeronL]

“”The fact that a respected pro-life news outlet vouches for her credibility isn’t enough?””

You know I’m on your side I hope, but the fact that a website or publication (Rolling Stone) vouches for the credibility of someone doesn’t mean squat these days.

Just a couple of days ago someone posted an article from Life Site News about an ex-porn guy and how he turned his life around. He was arrested for child molestation 2 days after it was published at Life Site News. I do not know if that article was removed.

As a matter of fact, Donny Pauling is quoted and is still featured in many archived articles at Life Site News as some sort of porn expert or something.

.............

So while I agree with you and your argument, that one line doesn’t work.

[wagglebee]

I understand your point. However, Rolling Stone did NOTHING to verify the UVA story.

This is a story about a woman who became pregnant via rape and kept her baby. ANYONE who has been involved with the pro-life movement is fully aware of women like this.