Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Circus set for Gruber at Capitol
The Hill ^ | December 8, 2014 | Sarah Ferris with Elise Viebeck

Posted on 12/09/2014 12:21:30 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2014 12:21:31 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife


2 posted on 12/09/2014 12:34:40 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I have previously posted my view that the Republicans are making a serious tactical error by conducting these hearings.


3 posted on 12/09/2014 1:02:52 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Naw. Gruber will have “a car wreck” and the world will move on.


4 posted on 12/09/2014 1:22:56 AM PST by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Pubbies beat the rats mercilessly with the Obamacare club this past year. The law is too precious to repeal.

Today's hearings will be an entertaining spectacle and no more.

5 posted on 12/09/2014 1:28:48 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The people who repeatedly voted to fund Obamacare will use this as pressure relief and nothing more. At the end of the day, Gruber still has his cash, Obamacare still exists and the GOP will chuckle knowing Gruber was right as idiots rush to reelect more of them in 16 expecting them to be in opposition to Democrats.


6 posted on 12/09/2014 1:33:40 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
We shall see who is more knowledgeable on the subject, who is more nimble on his feet and who on which side of the dais is looking for 5 minutes of TV face time.


7 posted on 12/09/2014 1:34:40 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Will Trey Gowdy be there I wonder?


8 posted on 12/09/2014 1:35:23 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Anyone know what channel will be carrying the circus? Thanks!


9 posted on 12/09/2014 1:42:30 AM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert (FUBO, and the useful idiots you rode in on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

I think it is an error to conduct them without getting all the information they need, for sure. To date, only his comments made in several venues and the multiple visits to the White House are topics of discussion.

I’d prefer they take some time and investigate all the multiple contracts he received over the last six years. How they were bid, what was the pricing structure, was effort on simultaneous contracts bid as full-time-equivalent, etc. The WH can give out contracts however they want (e.g., sole source), but the contract eventually has to go through some sort of award audit where all these things are reviewed and approved as legitimate.


10 posted on 12/09/2014 2:19:01 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I posted this on another thread and I think it worth repeating; it's no coincidence the headline grabbing report on the CIA is about to be disclosed by Democrats on the very day Gruber appears at these hearings.
11 posted on 12/09/2014 2:24:32 AM PST by Scottishlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
One astute blogger condensed Obamacare's 10,535 pages of flim-flam into 4 concise sentences:

1. To insure the uninsured, we first uninsure the insured.

2. Next, the newly uninsured get re-insured.

3. To re-insure the newly uninsured, we slap them w/ extra charges.

4. The extra charges are required so that the original insured, who became uninsured, and then re-insured, can now be insured (which we will provide free of charge).

This, then, is Marxist-style "redistribution of wealth"...... brought to you by lock-stepping Democrats' historic party line vote.

12 posted on 12/09/2014 2:32:20 AM PST by Liz (Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
The second witness, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Tavenner, should be nailed on this item:

HHS “Started” Individual Obamacare Applications Prior To Deadline; Obtained Personal Info From States
Shark Tank / FR Posted on Friday, April 04, 2014 by M. Thatcher

In the closing days of the open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) , the US Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS) was mailing out letters notifying certain Americans that the govt agency had already started a healthcare coverage application on their behalf.

The HHS letter stated that the information they used to begin the application for individual Healthcare was obtain by the state agency in charge of implementing Obamacare.

The next step for the individual would be to visit the web site Healthcare.gov and complete the already started application to see if they qualify for “Marketplace coverage.”

News of the HHS letter was first mentioned by a listener of the popular “Daybreak with Drew Steele” Show on Fox 92.5, which is out of Fort Myers, Florida.(Excerpt)

Read more at: http://www.shark-tank.com/2014/04/04/hhs-started-individual-obamaca ...

=======================================

NEED TO KNOW:

(1) which states participated in giving confidential information to HHS, and,

(2) how would state agencies know which of their citizens would want or need a new Obamacare-compliant policy.......without violating that individual's privacy--and without consulting the individual?

(3) for an application to be legally enforced, the individual would have had to sign it.

(4) Who signed the app? (Forgery must be considered.)

(5) When a third party commits you to a financial transaction, that person is considered your fiduciary.... and CANNOT act WRT a payment method or other financial burden that conflicts with your best interests.

=============================================

FBI TIPS PAGE https://tips.fbi.gov

13 posted on 12/09/2014 2:36:52 AM PST by Liz (Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Michigan legislators will request that relevant state agencies investigate the state’s deal with Gruber......they want to know (1) how Gruber was selected, and, (2) what services he provided for the money.

The states' selection process is crucial----(1) to scrutinize the credentials Gruber presented to states, (2) his monetary requirements, and, (3) what he based his expertise on.

“Mr. Gruber appears to be a very devious man – perhaps with a proclivity for fraud,” Michigan state Rep. McMillin said in an email.

Obama is downplaying Gruber's role, claiming he had no part in passing O/care. But if Gruber was NOT the Obamacare architect---then Gruber took money from states under false pretenses and should be prosecuted for govt fraud.

14 posted on 12/09/2014 2:40:50 AM PST by Liz (Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
.....as to Gruber's multiple govt contracts over the last six years: How they were bid? What was the pricing structure. Did he falsify his work schedule? Was he working on simultaneous govt contracts, and getting paid as a "full-time" consultant? The WH can give out contracts however they want (e.g., sole source), but the contract eventually has to go through some sort of award audit for review and approval......

All expenditures of federal funds must be fully delineated in the Federal Register and/or Congressional Review.

Taxpayers should ask their congressmen to supply them w/ copies of these public documents.

15 posted on 12/09/2014 2:53:08 AM PST by Liz (Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I realize that there is a fixed cost for the “program model” he uses and likely some sort of licensing fee. However, some of these contracts have “consulting” components which usually involve estimates of time needed.

I find it difficult to believe he can have that much available time. There are only about 1900-2000 work hours per year in normal situations. If you couple that with the amount of time he has to spend as an MIT professor doing something, where did he have the time to apply to all these contracts?


16 posted on 12/09/2014 2:56:38 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Excellent deconstruction-—should be considered by all of the committee.


17 posted on 12/09/2014 3:08:31 AM PST by Liz (Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
 photo POOHEAD_zpsa3502264.jpg
18 posted on 12/09/2014 3:28:14 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, N recruitot a cut Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Another big show of Outrage! Another big nothing as far as anything changing.


19 posted on 12/09/2014 3:31:39 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The description of a congressional hearing beforehand as a ‘circus’ should raise questions about the seriousness of a journal whose very mission is to cover congressional activities. The description may turn out to be true, but it speaks to a genuine lack of professionalism on the part of this publication.


20 posted on 12/09/2014 4:02:30 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson