Posted on 12/10/2014 4:09:11 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican
With the release of EPA’s 600-plus page proposal on ozone, all attention turns to the fine details of such an expansive regulation. American Action Forum (AAF) research found that 100 national and state parks might not the meet EPA’s standards of 60-70 parts per billion (ppb). Hardly transportation corridors and centers of heavy pollution, many observers would be surprised to know that Death Valley National Park, Sequoia National Park, and Cape Cod National Seashore have ozone readings of 71 to 87 ppb.
The map below details the geographic distribution of state and national parks in danger of EPA’s non-attainment label for ozone.
It’s not entirely clear how these levels would be addressed at national parks. It’s likely the state’s responsibility to address ozone concentrations at parks within their borders. Even though these parks don’t contain large manufacturing facilities or refineries, states will have to find ways to address each county that is in non-attainment.
What is clear is the price tag: $15 billion at the 65 ppb threshold. EPA is more than frank that this is one of the most expensive regulations ever, but they offer some solace: there are half a dozen other major recent regulations that will help states meet this expensive new standard. Here’s how EPA explains the situation:
“Existing and proposed federal rules, including the final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards [MATS], the final Tier 3 Vehicle Emissions and Fuels Standards, requirements to reduce the interstate transport of ozone [CSAPR], Regional Haze rules, and the proposed Clean Power Plan, will help states meet the proposed standards by making significant strides toward reducing ozone-forming pollution.”
In other words, there are so many other major rules in the regulatory world on emissions standards that overlap, they might make it easier to comply with the new ozone measure. Tallying costs for the litany of the past rules reveals outrageously high burdens. Here is the real cost of EPA’s ozone approach:
CSAPR: $1.85 Billion MATS: $10 Billion Standards for Particulate Matter: $350 Million Tier 3 Fuel Standards: $1.5 Billion Proposed Clean Power Plan: $8.8 Billion Latest Ozone Proposal: $15 billion Total Cost of Recent Proposals: $37.5 Billion
To put this $37.5 billion in perspective, it’s roughly seven times higher than the cost of all major rules issued in fiscal year 2011, according to the White House. $37.5 billion is almost as high as the entire bill for all major rules issued from 1999 to 2009, according to the White House. These recent regulations, coupled with an ozone rule that doesn’t even spare national parks, is a decade’s worth of regulating in just four or five years.
It’s likely these rules would add another layer of compliance for power plants and manufacturing facilities just as they have to deal with MATS and EPA’s incredibly complex Clean Power Plan. On one hand, plants have to add technology to capture emissions, which requires more energy and reduces efficiency. On the other hand, the Clean Power Plan will mandate that plants increase their efficiency to reduce greenhouse gases. As AAF commented to EPA, “Achieving efficiency gains while adding additional environmental protections unrelated to the Clean Power Plan may not be possible for the fleet.” Conclusion
The notion that EPA’s ozone regulation will affect just dirty power plants and manufacturing facilities is farce. In fact, many of the dirtiest power plants have already closed from MATS and CSAPR. These new regulations will hit states, their parks, national wildlife refuges, and countless pending construction projects across the U.S. The price tag from this rule isn’t just $15 billion; it’s closer to $37 billion and it’s likely that states and businesses won’t know the full burden for years.
And how did we get along before this Boondoggle of an Agency was foisted upon us by the criminally insane?
much better.
They see the solution as easy too.
Just prevent people from visiting the parks.
/johnny
Nah. They'll just close all the parks instead.
Seney National Wildlife refuge is a swamp.
As Mitt Romney says. “Michigan trees are just the right height”.
I’m assuming that wasn’t his intent but what the hell.
Places like Death Valley though several hundred miles away, gets some of the polluted air from Los Angeles, but the EPA will likely go after the clean air rural counties it lies in.
/johnny
But “ozone depletion” is supposed to be a bad thing, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion
.
/johnny
That looks real bad. The blue in the sky you see is ozone.
Excellent!!!!!!
Thank you.
“The solution is easy. Get rid of the EPA and all their stupid regulations.
/johnny”
*****************************************************************************************************
Mark Levin said on his show tonight that the Budget Continuing Resolution actually gave the EPA substantially more than Obama requested in his budget request. I can’t remember the amount exactly but it was maybe 1/2 to 1 billion more than requested.
You can’t make this crap up!
Ozone can also come from Pine Trees and was one of the reported sources for a lot of the ozone hitting the eastern coast cities of the Mid-Atlantic to New England Region.
Solution. Chop down all the Pine Trees and salt the earth where they grew.
Ban Christmas trees too.
Wipe out the Pine Barrens of New Jersey, along with Trenton, Camden, Hoboken, etc.
Solution to pollution - solved.
I guess I just don’t get it. They were worried about a hole in the ozone layer a few years back. Now they want to thin the layer down to 70 parts per BILLION. Sounds to me like we should make it thicker....
Is the EPA thinking about capping Yellowstone?
>> “The solution is easy. Get rid of the EPA and all their stupid regulations.” <<
.
Makes perfect sense to me.
Ozone is the stuff that cleans the air.
In the ‘70s and ‘80s people had ozone generators in their homes to make them smell fresh and clean.
A lightning storm makes the air fresh by making ozone.
This is all insane.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.