Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

Gruber is irrelevant.

Anybody with half a brain knew the whole premise was a complex, interrelated series of lies. Every single Member and Senator who voted “aye” knew it.

We don’t vote for Grubers. There are tens of thousands of Grubers, servicing Congress with the lies they need to do the things they do.

CONGRESS IS THE PROBLEM.


17 posted on 12/11/2014 4:44:14 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

No, the Democrat controlled congress is the problem

No Republicans voted for Obama care and the house has voted repeal so many times I’ve lost count


19 posted on 12/11/2014 4:47:12 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

Gruber is the most relevant part of King vs. Burwell. Nowhere in the law does it claim subsidies are for the Federal Exchange and quite the contrary, it was designed that way to punish states that don’t setup exchanges.
Besides Gruber’s admissions, the law also never states FPL or Federal Poverty Line, it states a percentage of the poverty line. If they meant the subsidies were for the Federal Exchange then they would have specifically used the model for the FPL and Gruber knew that.


25 posted on 12/11/2014 5:10:03 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson