[Natufian]

“...engaged in questionable behavior toward neighbouring countries..”

Invading neighbouring countries is just ‘questionable’?

[Bettyprob]

Because House resolutions “condemning” another country are stupid?

[aynrandfreak]

What does Putin have on him?

[Leaning Right]

The threats to America looming largest are, in order, radical Islamic terrorism and a still-Communist China...

Can't argue with that.

[edpc]

The wording spilled over with uncommon vitriol and inaccuracy at a time when our language must be focused, measured and responsible.

If I make a statement like this, I'll generally provide some excerpts and explain why I agree/disagree. Nothing like that in this article.

I read the resolution myself, expecting it to be a wild rant, ending with some Khrushchev-esque shoe banging. Most of it deals with Ukraine and Crimea, but it's generally about Russian threats to former Soviet satellites. So the only odd thing I found was this tangential throw away bullet point:

•cease its support for the Assad regime in Syria.

It really doesn't have much to do with the rest, but I'd hardly consider any of it vitriolic or innacurate.

[Jabba the Nutt]

"Ten Members voted “nay,” myself among them. I wish to explain why I took this unpopular position."

Dana, think clearly man, it may have been in the minority among the Members of Congress, that doesn't mean it was unpopular. Represent, bro!!