Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975
"The surrounding and blockading of a city, town, or fortress by an army attempting to capture it."

Maybe on the part of the popos, but DEFINITELY NOT on the part of the Jihadi.

9 posted on 12/15/2014 4:59:29 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2

Correct - it’s referred to as a siege because the police contain the events. That is what happened. The word is correct. And even if it was originally incorrect, it’s been used that way in English for at least 100 years (see the Sidney Street Siege of 1911).


10 posted on 12/15/2014 5:04:37 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Paladin2

The statement should have faced reality in today’s world and Australia should acknowledge self defense against these violent Muslims and other common street thugs and murderers by allowing concealed carry by non jihadi law abiding Aussies to stop those who would kill the common man.


11 posted on 12/15/2014 5:15:20 PM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson