But a permanent injunction stops him until there is a “trial on the merits” and ALL appeals are exhausted (years).
I think this is what Abbot seeks.
The real damage here is that future presidents will be sooooo tempted to “do it” in the future because Obama “did it” and got away with “it”.
So, the 3 legs of government are in danger of being sawed off permanently here in this one case. If so, future Presidents can play dictator any ole time they want.
Yep. You got it.
Abbot said this case is not about immigration, it’s about the Constitution.