Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress just banned the federal government from interfering with state medical marijuana laws
Red Alert Politics ^ | December 14, 2014 | Maria Santos

Posted on 12/17/2014 11:22:21 AM PST by ConservingFreedom

Dispensaries in the 23 states that have legalized medical marijuana can all breathe a sigh of relief. The massive “Cromnibus” spending bill passed Saturday night includes an amendment that essentially shuts down the DEA’s pricey prosecution of state-sanctioned medical marijuana.

The amendment bans the Justice Department from using funds to “prevent [medical marijuana states] from implementing their own State laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana.”

The bill now awaits approval from President Obama.

The Obama administration has regularly raided and prosecuted medical marijuana dispensaries regardless of state laws. According to a study by Americans for Safe Access, the administration has spent $80 million each year prosecuting medical marijuana, amounting to $200,000 every day and $300 million since Obama took office.

The amendment won’t eliminate all the legal problems medical marijuana producers face due to federal marijuana prohibition. It does not address banking issues that prohibit them from depositing their profits, for example. But advocacy groups are hailing it as a significant step in the right direction.

“The federal government will finally respect the decisions made by the majority of states that passed medical marijuana laws,” Rep. Sam Farr (D-Calif.), a co-sponsor of the amendment along with Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), told The Huffington Post. “This is great day for common sense because now our federal dollars will be spent more wisely on prosecuting criminals and not sick patients.”

The amendment will also shield industrial hemp production from the DEA. Industrial hemp production is legal in eighteen states and has been approved by the Obama administration, but just this year the DEA seized hemp seeds intended for a legal research program.

A majority of Americans support leaving marijuana laws up to the states, according to a recent study from Third Way. 78 percent support legalizing medical marijuana, and 67 percent support granting states who pass legalization a safe haven from federal laws. 60 percent prefer state control over marijuana legalization, rather than federal.

Meanwhile, the fate of weed in Washington D.C. post-Cromnibus remains in question. A group of congressmen banded together to quietly include a measure intended to freeze D.C.’s legalization by pulling funds to enact it. But now some lawmakers think there’s a loophole in the language that could end up making weed even more freely available in the District.

“Based on a plain reading of the bill and principles of statutory interpretation, it is arguable that the rider does not block D.C. from carrying out its marijuana legalization initiative,” said Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), speaking on the House floor last week.

Instead of blocking legalization, some now argue it would allow legalization to move forward but prevent enacting regulation to go along with it—leaving marijuana legal but unregulated.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cannabis; marijuana; pot; pufflist; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2014 11:22:21 AM PST by ConservingFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

To H*LL with morals there are dollars there!


2 posted on 12/17/2014 11:24:25 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
Every once in a great while Congress gets it right.

Now if only they would pass some more laws to get the feds off the backs of the states.

3 posted on 12/17/2014 11:24:45 AM PST by gdani (Ebola has exposed the U.S. as fearful, easy-to-manipulate weaklings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
But not Obamacare. Glad to see these guys have their priorities in order. I always wondered what they sere smoking, now I know...
4 posted on 12/17/2014 11:24:47 AM PST by Idaho_Cowboy (Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

Congress finally does something to support the 10th amendment, and we have to find fault with it, eh?


5 posted on 12/17/2014 11:26:36 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
To H*LL with morals there are dollars there!

Is there something "immoral" about medical marijuana?

6 posted on 12/17/2014 11:27:46 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

There’s probably an interesting interaction with the _Raich_ case from SCOTUS (to wit: “regulating interstate commerce includes stopping intrastate & personal activities reducing demand for illegal products”).


7 posted on 12/17/2014 11:28:19 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Can anybody explain to me why medical marijuana is governed by state law when every other drug is controlled by the FDA?


8 posted on 12/17/2014 11:28:33 AM PST by rhinohunter (Freepers aren't booing -- they're yelling "Cruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuz")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

The 10 Amendment is only supported if the States do something we agree with. Americans by and large just can’t handle the freedom that States’ Rights would lead to.


9 posted on 12/17/2014 11:30:07 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Yeah, prostitution, sodomy and drugs great tenth amendment topics. There is always a person hooked on drugs who appears on this forum and supports any vice.


10 posted on 12/17/2014 11:30:30 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter
Can anybody explain to me why medical marijuana is governed by state law when every other drug is controlled by the FDA?

Because the feds enjoy the power of banning more than the power of regulating, and so perpetuate the fiction that marijuana has no medically useful properties.

11 posted on 12/17/2014 11:30:58 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

“Is there something “immoral” about medical marijuana?”

Eighty years of government conditioning is hard to overcome.


12 posted on 12/17/2014 11:31:02 AM PST by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Good. Now ban the federal government from interfering with or enforcing any of the first ten amendments. Their constitutional interference with states regarding the first ten amendments has lead to such horrific disasters as the murder of 70+ million unborn by prohibiting state anti-abortion laws, banning prayer and Christianity and Bible teaching in state schools, interference with state marriage laws, and the parade of horribles goes no and on.


13 posted on 12/17/2014 11:32:11 AM PST by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Yes. as it is a fraudulent device to free up drugs for the addicts who appear on this forum whenever any criticism of the drug culture and its enablers appear. There are adequate prescription drugs to cover the issues claimed by the druggies.


14 posted on 12/17/2014 11:33:19 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Congress finally does something to support the 10th amendment, and we have to find fault with it, eh?

Most people on FR only pay lip service to states' rights & small government. They don't really believe in these things unless it suits their particular issue(s).

15 posted on 12/17/2014 11:33:27 AM PST by gdani (Ebola has exposed the U.S. as fearful, easy-to-manipulate weaklings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

I see now that the elections are over the republicans are back in the business-as-usual mode.

“Promises? We Don’t Keep No Stinking Promises!”


16 posted on 12/17/2014 11:34:27 AM PST by Iron Munro (D.H.S. has the same headcount as the US Marine Corps with twice the budget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Yeah, prostitution, sodomy and drugs great tenth amendment topics.

Should the feds step in and end Nevada's legal prostitution? And impose anti-sodomy laws on all states?

There is always a person hooked on drugs who appears on this forum and supports any vice.

There is always a person hooked on nanny-statism who appears on this forum and smears those with whom he disagrees.

17 posted on 12/17/2014 11:35:13 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
There are adequate prescription drugs to cover the issues claimed by the druggies.

The prescription drug cartel is far worse than anything having to do with medical marijuana.

18 posted on 12/17/2014 11:35:37 AM PST by gdani (Ebola has exposed the U.S. as fearful, easy-to-manipulate weaklings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Don't cheer Congress on this one. It passed a law, then withheld funds from the executive who is to enforce that law. If you ask me, this is Congress stepping on the executive's toes. If Congress wants to change the pot law, then change the pot law.

Between Congress, the executive and the courts, laws are effectively arbitrary anyway. They don't mean what they say, and enforcement is a matter of politics, not a matter of law.

19 posted on 12/17/2014 11:36:20 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Now if we can just get the Feds out of the classrooms and Moochelle out of the lunchrooms, we’ll be getting somewhere.


20 posted on 12/17/2014 11:37:22 AM PST by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson