Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

They don’t have to. The prosecution needs to prove that the “victim” didn’t say yes.


4 posted on 12/19/2014 11:07:59 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

No, this is not a criminal statute, it is a policy that will be forced on all public colleges in California. There is no “presumption of innocence” mandated in academic hearings.

The bill would require the institutions to have:

“(3) A policy that the standard used in determining whether the elements of the complaint against the accused have been demonstrated is the preponderance of the evidence.”

That’s a much lower standard than used in criminal proceedings. It’s what used in civil cases, and it basically amounts to, if 51% of the evidence presented points to guilt, you are guilty.


24 posted on 12/19/2014 11:23:33 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

“The prosecution needs to prove that the ‘victim’ didn’t say yes.”

One would hope so, but given today’s rabidly feminist all-men-are-rapists world we are in, the mere allegation is sometimes, many times, enough. . .especially in a university setting where standards of proof are twisted and inverted.


44 posted on 12/19/2014 11:34:16 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
The prosecution needs to prove that the “victim” didn’t say yes.

One would hope, but one would be wrong.

67 posted on 12/19/2014 12:58:48 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson