Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Just Emailed A Wrench To The International Space Station
iflScience ^ | 19 Dec 2014 | Janet Fang

Posted on 12/21/2014 1:25:28 PM PST by shove_it

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: null and void

His “master” would replace any absence of soul with something more to his liking...


61 posted on 12/23/2014 7:03:27 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

The cost of lifting the spare parts is essentially identical to the cost of lifting the raw materials to make those parts.

What this does is possibly allow for a smaller number of spare parts to be sent up, using the raw materials to make those parts that turn out to be needed.


62 posted on 12/23/2014 7:05:18 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

What if the 3D printer needs a part?


63 posted on 12/23/2014 7:07:57 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009
Don’t you need metal for some tools?

Most of the time. In this case I'm guessing it was more of a hard to reach or awkward location than a high torque application.

But no one said the technology is complete or fully evolved. The point of this story is the concept. Consider that they sent him a plastic wrench via email, and then think of the typical tractor-feed, dot-matrix printer of 25 years ago compared to the quality/size/price today's full color laser jets.

64 posted on 12/23/2014 7:11:13 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB
You might be confusing the transporter with the replicator. As I understand it, 3D printing is more akin to replicating. That is, they didn't "beam up" the ratchet wrench. They emailed the information for the crew to "print" one.

.5 /s

65 posted on 12/23/2014 7:11:44 AM PST by HandyDandy (Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy

Thanks - I was replying to a picture of a transporter bay, no?


66 posted on 12/23/2014 7:12:35 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: xp38

LOL. A good point, of course.

This tech is only going to get better. It probably won’t be long before we’re assembling things on the molecular or even atomic level.


67 posted on 12/23/2014 7:20:10 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Yes, now I do understand that you were replying to a picture of a transporter. Which I suppose is a perfect example of what can go wrong when communication takes place “virtually”. The problem in this case was on the receiving end (me). Still, I don’t think that “scanning” is the appropriate analogy for the transporter. My layman understanding of the transporter is that it rearranges one into some sort of energy (maybe plasma) and then reconstructs you on the other end. Theoretically there is nothing created nor destroyed in the process. Granted, it is not settled science fiction. Even well into the 30th millennium there were people who would not allow themselves to be transported. Call it “fear of flying”. Ironically, it would seem that those personages who did not have a strong confidence in the science of it were the very ones who had unfortunate transporter experiences. They may be the ones who knew of the very risky early experiment wherein a man and a fly had a most horrifying accident.


68 posted on 12/23/2014 7:46:52 AM PST by HandyDandy (Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: HandyDandy

not settled science fiction


Funny to be discussing how a fictional process works, no?


69 posted on 12/23/2014 7:48:34 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I generally find that fiction is less strange than truth.


70 posted on 12/23/2014 7:51:05 AM PST by HandyDandy (Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
"3-D printing will eventually evolve to become the "transporter" that we see on those Star Trek shows. Rather than creating a copy of an object from ones and zeros, you will be able to render the genuine article into ones and zeros that can then be sent (at speed of light) to be re-assembled at a far-distant portal."

Sci-fi has already used the concept (a LONG time back). Story line is that aliens contacted earth (a single individual) to let them build and have him man a "way station". In use, no physical objects were transmitted....just the individuals "consciousness" and the blueprint for his/her/its body. On transmission, the "empty" body was dissolved and flushed. At the receiving end, a new body was "built" and the received consciousness imprinted into it. The "goody" for the earth guy was great extension of his life.

I want to say that this is a Simak story....but it has been many, many, many years since I read it.

71 posted on 12/23/2014 9:03:19 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MrB

MrB, the way I do it is to design the part and the gap between the outer and the “inside” part — and then put in “support.” Supports are like buttresses that are thinly layered (and often look like small twigs on the trunk — that is the part you wish to keep). After printing completes, you break off or file away the thin, easily removable supports. There are several youtube videos about 3d printing support. Meshmixer is a free program where one can detect unsupported overhangs and gaps and support them with thin filament support. “Meshmixer” and “3d support” are youtube search terms that will get you a video of the process.


72 posted on 12/23/2014 12:10:35 PM PST by bajabaja (Too ugly to be scanned at the airports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Cool!


73 posted on 12/23/2014 12:43:42 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Where no man wrench has gone before.
74 posted on 12/23/2014 12:47:08 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Hmm. Could he design his own stuff on that printer?


75 posted on 12/23/2014 8:15:08 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson