Skip to comments.
Obama, the Least Lame President?
New York Times ^
| December 21, 2014
| By IAN AYRES and JOHN FABIAN WITT
Posted on 12/22/2014 2:31:17 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: jsanders2001
It took two commie authors to come up with this tripe
To: Yogafist
I wish I shared your enthusiasm. I don’t believe either party will move to limit the power of government.
Ever.
22
posted on
12/22/2014 3:33:33 PM PST
by
Comment Not Approved
(When bureaucrats outlaw hunting, outlaws will hunt bureaucrats.)
To: Don Corleone
You said...
“Most of Stalin's,Mao’sand Kin Jung Un’s agenda had little or no support either. Look what happened there”
Yup.
And our problems are compounded by the GOP’s eagerness to roll on their backs for Obama
23
posted on
12/22/2014 3:41:43 PM PST
by
LMAO
(("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Obama’s STILL the lamest president ever. Now, he’s directionless too.
24
posted on
12/22/2014 3:47:26 PM PST
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Obama, the Least Lame President?"
This isn't unique. Hitler was pretty active up until the day he resigned.
To: jsanders2001
A fabian wit? Is that,like, a socialist halfwit, or is it a socialist nitwit?
26
posted on
12/22/2014 3:59:29 PM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: SkyDancer
Obama the Lame is eerily similar to Timur the Lame (Tamerlane) who killed half the people in Central Asia before his death in 1405. Obama might, like Timur, want to establish a Muslim empire?
27
posted on
12/22/2014 4:05:05 PM PST
by
JimSEA
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Obama, the Least Male President There, Fixed It™
28
posted on
12/22/2014 4:23:29 PM PST
by
mikrofon
(Merry Christmas! BUMP)
To: mikrofon
Odumbo was “LAME” long before he became president (which he is not eligible to be). We can only hope that the new senate and congress leadership is changed.
29
posted on
12/22/2014 5:02:35 PM PST
by
DaveA37
(bLACK)
To: GeronL
I guess rule by decree is something the NY Times lovesThey do! But only when the left does it.
30
posted on
12/22/2014 5:06:08 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
("Two parties, governing AGAINST the will of the people, not with the consent of the governed." --MrB)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As of 2010 there are no Dim “lame duck” sessions. When they loose they use every bit of their power to screw the people who voted against them. This make them not “lame duck” but rather “stiff D...”
Meanwhile, you are totally correct the Republicans act like the lame ducks.
31
posted on
12/22/2014 5:51:53 PM PST
by
logic101.net
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Is there a picture somewhere of John Fabian Witt? That aught to be good.
32
posted on
12/22/2014 5:54:57 PM PST
by
Batman11
(Obama is not American.. he has no clue what it is to be American.)
To: Comment Not Approved
” I wish I shared your enthusiasm. I dont believe either party will move to limit the power of government.
Ever."
Not without bloodshed. Past history shows it.
33
posted on
12/22/2014 6:03:44 PM PST
by
right way right
(America will reject the suck of Socialist Freedumb, one way or another.)
To: God luvs America
> are you referring to the NY Slimes or GOPe?
Rhetorical question right?...: )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson