1 posted on
12/24/2014 3:15:51 PM PST by
Dallas59
To: Dallas59
I wouldn’t spend a dime on this movie. I heard it stinks.
2 posted on
12/24/2014 3:17:34 PM PST by
dforest
To: Dallas59
6 bucks? They pay me or I pay them?
4 posted on
12/24/2014 3:18:24 PM PST by
867V309
(Boehner is the new Pelosi)
To: Dallas59
I almost have interest because of the controversy but no. Not going to waste my time.
7 posted on
12/24/2014 3:27:01 PM PST by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
To: Dallas59
I’m not interested in their movie.
9 posted on
12/24/2014 3:33:03 PM PST by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: Dallas59
Everybody eats way too much on Christmas Eve. I've had about 11 oatmeal cookies, a piece of pecan pie, some scallops wrapped with bacon and about a pound of chicken legs. Not to mention the egg nog, brandy, port wine, honey mead, and these little chocolate coconut balls that taste like, well, I'm not really sure. But they are good - and I think they might have been drenched in rum before they were dipped in chocolate.
Currently listening to Anorak Christmas by Sally Shapiro.
To: Dallas59
did anyone watch it... I’ve never liked a Seth Rogan film, so I ain’t spending anything on it
18 posted on
12/24/2014 4:09:41 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Dallas59
Seth Rogan isn't an A list comedian. I've seen his movie This Is the End and its mediocre crappy.
This whole brouhaha smells like a PR gimmick by Sony movies. Free publicity for raunchy comedy which would have disappeared from the movie theaters faster than Tom Cruise's Edge of Tomorrow.
22 posted on
12/24/2014 4:26:08 PM PST by
RginTN
To: Dallas59
Risky move under ordinary circumstances because if the movie really stinks (which appears to be the case here), then word of mouth could kill subsequent theater attendance.
I suppose given the fact that the movie has already leaked, etc., that Sony figures they don’t have much to lose with this experiment, particularly if the experiment is to determine whether the pre-release of a BAD movie will kill theater results.
23 posted on
12/24/2014 4:38:46 PM PST by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Dallas59
To: Dallas59
The whole situation was hilarious to me because a bunch of leftist totalitarians who basically agree on things were going at it with each other with expensive destruction of assets as a result. Sony leadership are also widely known by another name...the RIAA. Nice to see them take one in the kazoo once in a while. 5 stars....I mean, unless I actually have to watch the movie.
28 posted on
12/24/2014 6:09:34 PM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
I notice that there’s a very strange dynamic at play on this forum. Corporations are believed to be guilty until proven innocent.
My goodness that sounds a lot like Soros and his fellow travelers.
Lets see, big banks, corporations, Wall Street...
Whew. Who needs enemies when there are plenty of friends like some of us.
29 posted on
12/24/2014 6:33:50 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
To: Dallas59
37 posted on
12/24/2014 7:47:03 PM PST by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
To: Dallas59
A few days ago they were scared to death that the hackers would release the next batch of stolen emails. That's what the hackers said they would do if Sony released this movie.
I wonder why Sony's no longer worried about that.
To: Dallas59
42 posted on
12/24/2014 8:48:36 PM PST by
Dallas59
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson