Okay, let’s write a movie that takes place in the 1840s. A group of African slaves played by Neil Patrick Harris, Liv Tyler, Kevin Sorbo, and Kelsey Grammer all toil away under the watchful eyes of their cruel master, Jamie Fox as the fictional Cyrus McCormick, Alabaman cotton Farmer known locally as the Crazed Scot for his horrible temper.
When one day, Pierre, a local tailor played by Jackie Chan, let’s them know he’s a member of the Underground Railroad.
They can have a black James Bond but they have to ditch character continuity.
Your logic (shockingly) is absurd. A group of slaves would obviously be black. Of course, they could have been owned by a black man. That was known to happen.
Given that James Bond is Scottish, there is nothing to suggest he must be white. There are black Scots. The Bond franchise has been done to death. Whats wrong wish shaking it up a bit? He’s a FICTIONAL character. The poutage on this topic is ridiculous.