Posted on 12/26/2014 4:40:20 AM PST by Zakeet
In January, 2008, I changed my party registration from R to D (for five minutes) so I could vote for Barack Hussein Obama in the NH primary, figuring that he would be so easy to beat that even McCain could do it.
What have I learned since then?
I've learned that the voters will choose a committed Leftist, even one quite radical, over a candidate who represents K Street, the Chamber of Crony Capitalism, and Goldman Sachs.
Princess Liawatha will be the next President of the United States if she gets to run against Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, or Mitt Romney.
I hate to say this, but if she gets to run against a guy married to a Goldman Sachs managing director, she stands a damn good chance.
The Democrats are working on purging their party of inconsistencies. The Republicans are choking on theirs.
Get ready for the White Sweat Lodge replacing the White Hut, and remember, you heard it here first.
What does “need” have to do with ANYTHING in the politics of that territory once known as “the United States of America”?
People have been mixing up “needs” with “wants” for so long that there is no longer a critical review of just what is a “need” and something that is only a “want”.
People actually need an opportunity to test themselves, and this includes the inalienable right to failure. Loading up the dice so that some are given a totally unwarranted and lopsided advantage comes under the designation of “want”, but it is not a “need”.
If Cruz should be nominated by the Republican Party (which I consider extremely unlikely), 9 out of 10 voters will go to the polls convinced that Goldman Sachs is worse than ISIS.
I think Cruz's wife's employment is an enormous problem.
If you can dig up a daguerreotype of her gloating after Custer’s Last Stand, that probably would put a stake through her candidacy. Not a photoshop - a real daguerreotype. I know that would involve a different tribe, but who knows if she’s even telling the truth about that.
On second thought, given the state of education in the US, no one would know what that was all about anyway. Never mind.
You’re right.
A. She’s going to be the candidate
B. She’s going to be hard to beat
The idea that the Blacks put either Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, or barrack Obama in office is a figment in the imagination of the media. Population wise there are not blacks to elect anyone. Even if the Blacks made up 15% of the population, which they don’t, they still need 36 % to reach 51%. It has to be America haters and White Liberals [actually they are both one and the same]that put these people in office.
If America is completely failed, yes. Obama was elected for a cool factor as certain groups saw him. Not left wing ideology. Warren has none of that.
_________________
And what part of not failed do you see?
You have a point there.
Whoever wins in 2016, whether Bush or Warren or Mrs. Bill the one sure thing is that the country will take another lurch toward totalism. The tipping point to inevitability came in 1913. The slope steepened in 1988 and again in 2004 and the edge of the cliff was passed in 2008. It is freefall time and it is rocks ahead.
Hell....I didn't think the bummer had a chance 3 years ago..!
Want to know who the next Pres' is going to be...? Ask George Soros....!
Look at FL for instance. 65,000 legal ballots left the Governor's race blank. A huge majority of those ballots most likely came from dem voters who could not vote for the ex-Republican governor Crist. Heck, they did not even vote for the Green Party candidate because there was not a dem candidate affiliation next to their name. In the end, any hardcore dem has a good shot at the Presidency in 2016, especially a Warren totalitarian type.
IF we lived in a sane world, I would argue with that.
No. Next question?
No, but she is the candidate that this electorate deserves.
Be careful what you wish for. We said the same thing about Obama.
Is Elizabeth Warren the candidate America needs?
Most certainly, the precedent has been set by this this lying hypocrite to elect another lying hypocrite. The population of this country has so little interest in the direction we are headed that I think that Warren has a good chance.
Nothing worries me as much as the fact that so many posters here believe a) that Warren would be easy to beat and b) that the husband of a Goldman Sachs managing director is the guy to do it.
The Money Question is rising from the grave, about to re-enter our politics after 100 years.
Nobody likes a finger wagging scold in granny glasses; too much like one’s least-liked schoolteacher or first wife.
Fauxcahontas is arrogant & lectures those she is talking to.
Would love to see Lizzie in a debate with Ted Cruz; he would play her like a cheap fiddle & have her belting out the “Internationale” with a clenched fist salute.
BTW, google “Elizabeth Warren net worth”. For a socialist who should be shopping at Goodwill, she’s muy loaded with `filthy capitalist dollars’. Fourteen plus million of them.
“If America is completely failed, yes. Obama was elected for a cool factor as certain groups saw him. Not left wing ideology. Warren has none of that.”
Actually, you are wrong. like Hitlery, Warren has the “cool factor criteria” of being “not male”. What she is is up for further discussion. If anything it will be not unlike 0Bummer’s election if either Hitlery or Warren were to gain their party’s nomination. The female counter parts of this country would vote for her not because of her ideologies but based on what is absent between her legs and the bumps on her chest. The election of 0Bummer, whether for good or for ill, has shown the way in which a female can get elected to the number 1 position of the world. This is one of the most important lessons from the election of a person other than white to the WH.
IMO Warren should be in jail for her fraud she has perpetrated on the citizens and on the indigenous people of this country. She should not be in the senate and definitely should not be out roaming the streets of our fair nation.
If you think the media loves Obama, wait until they get a hold of Lizzie.
They will embrace her anti bank bias, and the kids will love it. And as long as there is eight years between uncontested elections, she will suck in the younger ones with her populist rhetoric.
I would hope she would get blown out a la McGovern. But I am not sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.