Replies

The destruction of inner cities did lead to white flight to the suburbs, but in a way it was part of a Democrat real estate scam repeated all over the country. In my book of 2001, I called it "the push" buying cheap abandoned ag land and plopping up suburbs. It's still going on to a degree in California's Central Valley today what with the Delta Smelt and "High Speed Rail."

In the book I explained the flip side strategy of the Agenda 21 (by name, as I was well aware of it) as "the squeeze." Forcing people out of rural and suburban areas with "environmental protections" and into cheap real estate in cities acquired by eminent domain: "Sustainable Development" ("stack and pack" to some). Zero loves that idea because it forces "white Amerika" to face those 'left behind' in an urban squalor supposedly bereft of cash white people took with them. So it goes. The key point is that the developers are making more money on less land by making less available for housing, a demand pumped up by illegal immigration. It keeps the real estate "appreciating" such that the loan reserves of the banks still look good.