[proxy_user]

“Moe points out that this is likely more of a feature than a bug, and it’s not going to change any time soon. As long as you are unable to predict what your medical requirements will be and the rules keep changing from year to year, there will be no effective way to plan for precisely what your costs will be and how the reimbursements will affect you come tax time.”

The subsidies are based on your income, not your medical requirements. All you have to do is accurately predict your income for next year. How hard is that? (Don’t answer!)

[OneWingedShark]

All you have to do is accurately predict your income for next year. How hard is that? (Don’t answer!)

Well, considering the economy's condition, and the amount of regulation... I think trending towards $0 is accurate.

[DonaldC]

So is somebody not just looking at income but also what people are buying?

[sarasmom]

There is that tiny little case before the Supreme Court...the abundantly clear one about the 36 states who did not set up “Federal ACA compliant exchanges” for their citizens.

So,when those promised Federal tax “subsidies” for the deluded citizens who gleefully purchased the government approved and illegal commercial insurance policies, are declared unconstitutional in those 36 states, what happens next?

A total 2015 tax amnesty for all USA citizens?

ROTFLMAO!

How will the USSC possibly attempt to justify not rendering a decision in this case, in the first week of January, before any citizen gets their W2s and 1099 tax forms?

I already find it inexcusable that this clear case of constitutional law was not rendered last year!