Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Altura Ct.

“The officer, who was working off-duty security at the store”

If the officer was off-duty, then he’s not acting in an official capacity, and therefore should not be considered a “public servant” in this situation.

Davidson was in the wrong to assault him, but he should only face the charges he would be liable for if the security guard had been a “civilian”.


22 posted on 01/07/2015 8:02:54 AM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Pig

“Davidson was in the wrong to assault him...”

The story says the security guard assaulted Davidson, by grabbing him and shoving him through a door. Someone does that to me, I have a right to defend myself.


27 posted on 01/07/2015 8:12:53 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Little Pig

“If the officer was off-duty, then he’s not acting in an official capacity”

Not exactly corect. “Off duty” officers remains a police officer and retain all police powers anmd authorty.


38 posted on 01/07/2015 8:21:47 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson