Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
But what about all the natural gas used to fire this system? The poo is not the primary fuel.

And still, the EPA would never allow the burning of the poo without proper permits and treatment of the combustion gasses and the residual ash.

Is it a neat idea in some third world country with limited sewage and power generation capabilities? Yes. Would it ever be allowed to function in the United States with our EPA laws? No.

50 posted on 01/08/2015 11:38:49 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: blackdog

Didn’t see mention of natural gas as a fuel. That would make sense.

The article seemed to imply the whole thing is fueled by the heat value of the poo.

The internet is a very weird place. Here’s an article on the heat value of sewage sludge. Apparently it is somewhat higher per unit of weight than most types of coal.

https://web.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel/preprint%20archive/Files/36_4_NEW%20YORK_08-91_1653.pdf

However, that is for dewatered sludge. Getting the water out requires energy, and I suspect it requires more energy than is gained when the dewatered sludge is burned.

There ain’t no such thing as a free energy lunch.


52 posted on 01/08/2015 11:58:56 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson