Conversely, inaction will be viewed as acceptance of violence performed in the name of Islam.
Bravo, Bobby Jindal. Let's make them prove the "Religion of Peace" label.
No, that hasn't been what recent history teaches us. When school-teachers are overcome with political correctness, a Muslim-in-Chief has hundreds of millions of thank-yous for his election contributions to write, his bought-and-paid-for MSM all wish to grow up like Candy Crowley, and taqiyyah-practicing co-religionists all get in synch, your deduced "acceptance of violence" connection gets totally turned on its head and "inactive" muslims are not held to account. Despite over a millenium of Islamic barbarity, inaction has much more closely and historically caused or allowed the ignorant to believe the propaganda that Islam is a Religion of Peace (TM).
Correctly understood, the Koran and history paints a vivid picture of their unrelentingly murderous cult that desires to force everyone, no matter where they hide, to submit to Islam or die.
We cannot afford to continue to allow co-religionists of the active fanatics to find cover as so-called "moderates". Those that do not actively denounce their Islamicist brethren's activities (and are in hiding, as Salman Rushdie) are simply complicit as silent, taqiyyah-manifesting jihadists. They're probably donating to a number of charities that are in active support of the more murderous aspects of jihad or its aftermath, but the average person just doesn't see it, as such things kept hidden from the infidel.
HF