The myth of the methane menace

The Washington Times ^ | January 18, 2015 | Stephen Moore

[bert]

This is the crisis de jour

the real problems that need to be totally eliminated are moonbat activists. collectively they are America’s greatest economic problem. If they were gone, their economic braking actions gone, we could all be rich

[thackney]

[1010RD]

The EPA rules and regs are designed to help environmentalists regulate the economy to death. How do you fix that without a GOP sweep of all branches?

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “What’s next, ‘catalytic converters’ for livestock?” <<

.
How about cognitive converters for liberals!

.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Your GOP sweep would just give us more GOPe drones to vote for Boner.

.

[editor-surveyor]

.
We need a department of Inconvenient Facts to sweep this data under the rug.

.

[vette6387]

“How about cognitive converters for liberals!”

But that would imply that there is some basis for cognition.

[vette6387]

“Or catalytic converters for humans...”

Interim solution: Eliminate team sports on TV. No beer, no pizza, no chilli dogs; ergo reduced “emissions.”

[1010RD]

For conservatives to succeed and thrive politically, we’ll need to learn to work with the army with have. You don’t get to play, if you don’t win.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Putting more GOPe shills in office is not “winning.”

Mystery Babylon is not going to help us; they are who we are fighting.

.

[Rocky]

Let’s Rethink New Methane Policy

A new set of regulations on the oil and natural-gas industries, targeting emissions of methane are based on shoddy climate science.

Letters, S. Fred Singer, WSJ, Jan 15, 2015

http://www.wsj.com/articles/lets-rethink-new-methane-policy-letters-to-the-editor-1421363688

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/01/19/weekly-climate-and-energy-news-roundup-164/