Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radar Data: AirAsia Plane Climbed At Speed 'Beyond Normal' And Then Stalled
Business Insider ^ | 01/20/2015

Posted on 01/20/2015 8:24:32 AM PST by SeekAndFind

An AirAsia plane that crashed into the Java Sea last month with 162 people on board climbed at a faster than normal speed and then stalled, the Indonesian transport minister said Tuesday.

Flight QZ8501 went down on Dec. 28 in stormy weather, during what was supposed to be a short trip from the Indonesian city of Surabaya to Singapore.

Indonesia's meteorological agency has said bad weather may have caused the crash, and investigators are analysing the data from the jet's black boxes before releasing a preliminary report.

Just moments before the plane disappeared off the radar, the pilot had asked to climb to avoid the storm. He was not immediately granted permission because of heavy air traffic.

"In the final minutes, the plane climbed at a speed which was beyond normal," Transport Minister Ignasius Jonan told reporters, citing radar data.

"The plane suddenly went up at a speed above the normal limit that it was able to climb to. Then it stalled."

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airasia; flightqz8501
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 01/20/2015 8:24:32 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pilot disorientation in IFR conditions?

CC


2 posted on 01/20/2015 8:30:54 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (Cogito ergo non liberalo: I think, therefore I'm not a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A proper recovery from what looks like it was a full stall (with perhaps double flameouts) would undoubtedly involve some rather uncomfortable maneuvers in the recovery process (some abrupt pitch, yaw, and roll changes), and possibly zero, or even negative Gs for a bit.

And, if there was a double flameout as an extra added bonus, that would increase the pilot pucker factor even more.

This would be rough for any pilot, but if those folks had been trained only in slow reacting passenger-type aircraft, they had a trying experience ahead of them.

One for which they might not have been fully prepared.


3 posted on 01/20/2015 8:31:53 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Airbus pitot tube icing?


4 posted on 01/20/2015 8:32:38 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sudden Jihad Syndrome after finding out there were so many Christians on board?


5 posted on 01/20/2015 8:34:01 AM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Airbusitis

This is what happens when your inexperienced pilots do nothing except enter data unto the flight computer and do little hand flying.

Sounds like the Air France flight that pitched into the Atlantic after the speed indications failed. The pilots were so confused, they spent their final minutes doing exactly the opposite of what every new pilot is taught.


6 posted on 01/20/2015 8:34:40 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9 (Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds to me that they may have encountered the same problem as the Airbus that crashed off the coast of Brazil a few years back. IOW, frozen airspeed sensors giving the computer-controlled flight system a nervous breakdown. The triply-redundant FCS cannot handle more than one bad channel.


7 posted on 01/20/2015 8:34:43 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9

Hence reason #1 of 3 why I don’t fly at all anymore. #2 is I will not be fondled by TSA, #3 I go nowhere I cannot carry.


8 posted on 01/20/2015 8:37:41 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In reading the text I think the headline is misleading. The cause appears to be an excessive rate of climb which could occur at any airspeed.

This points to pilot error possibly induced by misreading of or faulty instrument readings.

9 posted on 01/20/2015 8:39:53 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

“Hence reason #1 of 3 why I don’t fly at all anymore. #2 is I will not be fondled by TSA, #3 I go nowhere I cannot carry.”

Amen.


10 posted on 01/20/2015 8:40:42 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (When the political winds turn ugly I will stand with Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

What makes you think the pilot was controlling the aircraft? Airbus has a TMR computer system controlling it and false airspeed and/or pressure data could have given the system a nervous breakdown, as apparently happened to another Airbus off Brazil.


11 posted on 01/20/2015 8:48:28 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

You might be interested in reading about the infamous Airbus crash at the Paris airshow. In that case, the computer crashed the plane while the test pilot was trying to stop it from doing so.


12 posted on 01/20/2015 8:51:56 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

If I recall correctly, the pilot wanted to change altitude due to a large thunderstorm in his flight path. The updrafts in those conditions could have pulled the plane upwards at a high rate of speed. If the pilot then over-compensated, he could have put them into a dive for which there was no recovery.


13 posted on 01/20/2015 8:51:56 AM PST by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Barrel roll?

“Watch this y’all...”


14 posted on 01/20/2015 8:52:46 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

Could be, but the stalling, if true, suggests otherwise. Also, see post 11.


15 posted on 01/20/2015 8:55:37 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9

One thing I learned about Aibus control systems after the Air France crash is that the system sums the inputs from the control yokes together, so if one pilot was pushing forward, and the other was pulling back, the total input would be zero. In that crash, one pilot was treating the situation correectly and the other was negating his actions.


16 posted on 01/20/2015 8:56:10 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

http://www.aviationtoday.com/regions/usa/More-Pitot-Tube-Incidents-Revealed_72414.html#.VL6Ij3R0yUk

Airbus pitot tube problems.


17 posted on 01/20/2015 8:56:40 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
Yes (see post 11), but that is an old article and the pitot problem was supposed to have been fixed since then. I wonder.
18 posted on 01/20/2015 9:01:25 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

The phrase “high rate of speed” irks me to no end. Speed is distance/over time. It is already a rate, or ratio, of one data compared to another. It is the same as writing 1:3, a ratio. Speed is a ratio, and therefore a rate. To write “rate of speed” would look like this, 1:3:5, in which the third parameter would have to be a value derived from yet another ratio in order to make any sense at all, which it clearly doesn’t: DISTANCE:TIME/X?


19 posted on 01/20/2015 9:03:01 AM PST by lefty-lie-spy (Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/ - via iPhone from Tokyo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9

“The pilots were so confused, they spent their final minutes doing exactly the opposite of what every new pilot is taught.”

The copilot. The pilot was not in the cockpit till too late.


20 posted on 01/20/2015 9:09:27 AM PST by TexasGator (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson