RE:
“said a Hill staffer who opposes the leaders’ bills.
That’s a nice start (i.e. a heads up) but until you can present an article with an actual named opponent of the bill stating facts about the bill, you got nothing, Just innuendo”
Do statements from the bill’s supporters warrant concern?
“Extra fencing would be a waste of money, according to Texas Rep. Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security.
“The bill matches resources to needs, putting 27 more miles of fencing where fencing is needed, and technology where technology is needed,” said the statement.
“In our conversations with outside groups, experts and stakeholders, we learned that it would be an inefficient use of taxpayer money to complete the fence. … We are using that money to utilize other technology to create a secure border,” said the statement.”
Has a 100% sealed border voting record e.g. USBC rating. Some quotes stripped from context, no text from the bill. And all we have on the other side is some griping from an anonymous staffer. Not good enough. If someone doesn't like the bill, they need to stand up, identify themselves, and lead. Otherwise we have nothing but whisper versus whisper and Politico and all the rest of the media will win at that game.
Mike Lee is now sending out emails saying he “needs our help” on stopping the FCC from taking over the internet.
The FCC is going to put a tax on the web. I thought only congress could raise taxes.